UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
| Filed by the Registrantx | ||||
| Filed by a Party other than the Registrant | ||||
| Check the appropriate box: | ||||
| ¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||
| Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||||
| x | Definitive Proxy Statement | |||
| Definitive Additional Materials | ||||
| Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 | ||||
| East West Bancorp, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
| Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
| x | No fee required. | |||
| Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||||
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
| (5) | Total fee paid: | |||
| Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||
| Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
| (3) | Filing Party: | |||
| (4) | Date Filed: | |||
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time on May 24, 201819, 2020
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of East West Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on May 24, 2018,19, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time, at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 6th Floor, Pasadena, California, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:
| 1. | To elect eight directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and to serve until their successors are elected and qualified; |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation for |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, |
| 4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. |
The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on March 29, 201823, 2020 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only holders of our common stock as of the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the Proxy Statement.
Properly signed and returned proxy cards permit each proxy holder to vote on any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any and all adjournments thereof, in his or her discretion. As of the date of mailing, the Board of Directors of the Company is not aware of any other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, WE URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR VOTE VIA THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL. Instructions for voting are described in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and proxy card.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2020:
Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules related to the availability of proxy materials, the Company has made its Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 available on the Company’s corporate website at www.eastwestbank.com/annual. The proxy materials are also made available at www.envisionreports.com/EWBC.
We intend to hold our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person. However, we are actively monitoring coronavirus (COVID-19) developments, and we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state and local governments are imposing and may continue to impose. For that reason, we reserve the right to change the date, time, and means of convening the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including through remote communications. If we take this step, we will announce the decision to do so in advance, and details will be issued by press release, posted on our website at http://investor.eastwestbank.com/ and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as additional soliciting materials. Please monitor our website for updated information. If you are planning to attend our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please check the website one week prior to the currently scheduled meeting date.
Due to the business disruption caused by COVID-19, we are making this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 available to stockholders of record at www.envisionreports.com/EWBC. On or about April 9, 2020, we will begin mailing to our stockholders of record a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access and review this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. This Notice also instructs you how you may submit your proxy over the internet or via telephone. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting those materials included in this Notice.
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy and other enclosures will be mailed to our beneficial stockholders on or about April 13, 2020.
We appreciate your continued support of the Company.
By order of the Board of Directors,
 | |
DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE
Corporate Secretary
Pasadena, California
April 3, 2020
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
4
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. For more complete information regarding East West Bancorp, Inc.’s (the “Company”) 2017the Company’s 2019 financial performance, please review our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
2019 (“Annual Report on Form 10-K”).
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxyproxy card (the “Proxy”) are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (“Board”) for use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 24, 2018,19, 2020, and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement and the enclosed Proxy and other enclosures are first being mailed to stockholders on or about April 18, 2018. Only stockholders of record on March 29, 201823, 2020 (“Record Date”) are entitled to vote in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. The mailing address of the Company’s principal executive office is 135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101.
Matters to be Considered and Vote Recommendation
We are asking stockholders to vote on the following matters at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
| Matters for Stockholder Consideration | Our Board’s Recommendation | |
Proposal To elect eight directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and to serve until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board believes that the eight |
FOR each Director Nominee
| |
Proposal The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its stockholders to approve the compensation |
FOR | |
Proposal 3: Ratification of Auditors (page The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31,
|
FOR |
5
East West Bancorp, Inc. at a Glance
East West Bancorp, Inc. is the holding company for East West Bank (sometimes, the “Bank”) with total assets of $37.2$44.2 billion as of December 31, 2017. East West2019. The Bank commenced operationsopened its doors in 1973 as a federally chartered savings institution servingto provide access to banking to the underserved immigrant Chinese-American community. ThroughOver the years, this market has grown and flourished and the Bank has grown and flourished right along with it. In 1995, the Bank converted its charter to a commercial bank to keep pace with its customers’ expanding commercial banking needs.
Since its public listing in 1999, the Company’s assets have grown from $2.1 billion to $44.2 billion and its net earnings have grown from $18 million to $674 million as of December 31, 2019. Starting with one small branch in the heart of Chinatown in Los Angeles, California, East West Bank has grown into a full-service commercial bank with over 130 locations in key citiestoday is one of the top 25 publicly traded banks in the U.S.country by market capitalization, and one of the largest independent banks headquartered in California serving a wide array of consumer and commercial interests. The Bank operates over 125 locations worldwide, including in the United States markets of California, Georgia, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, Texas and Washington. In Greater China.China, East West operates full-service branches in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Shantou and Shenzhen, and representative offices in Beijing, Chongqing, Guangzhou, and Xiamen. Since the Company’s inception, the size of its workforce has expanded from 370 to over 3,200 employees worldwide.
Over the years, the Bank has steadily evolved the sophistication of its banking products and services to remain relevant and connected to its customers and communities. As one of the only banks to focus primarily on the U.S. and Greater China markets, East Westthe Bank continues to expand its extensive global network of contacts and resources to better meet its customers’bridge diverse financial needs in and between the world’s two largest markets. Company highlights include:
Fiscal 2017 HighlightsFinancial Highli+ghts
The Company achieved record earnings in 2017, which was the result of its continued focus on creating sustainable, expandable and profitable customer relationships and its unique business model of serving as thehad strong financial bridge between the East and the West.results for 2019. The sustained success of the Company’s customer focus and bridge model is reflected in the following key metrics:
financial results and rankings:
| · |
| · |
| · | Record Deposits: Total deposits grew $1.9 billion, or 5.3%, to a record $37.3 billion as of |
| · | Among Best Banks in America: Ranked |
_____________________
1 Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global.
2 Forbes article dated January 10, 2018.
22, 2020.
6
Throughout its history, the Company has maintained an unwavering spirit of giving back to the communities in which it operatesoperates. The Bank has been proud to serve local communities by supportingfinancing affordable housing, providing community development loans and lending to small businesses. The Company also recognizes that adopting environmentally responsible practices is part of good corporate governance and essential to local and global wellbeing. Accordingly, East West Bank has expanded its renewable energy commercial lending and banking business. Along with providing financing for clean energy companies, the Company also invests, through tax credit investments, in renewable energy projects to support a cleaner environment and greener planet.
In addition, the Bank has partnered with a diverse group of non-profit and community-based organizations dedicated to community wellbeing.bring much-needed services to the underserved in the communities in which it operates. Moreover, the Bank encourages its employees to volunteer in their communities. As active volunteers, the Bank’s associates work alongside numerous local organizations to promote a variety of causes including affordable housing, financial literacy and the arts. The following are some examples of the Company’s recent community investments:investments and social programs:
| · | 1 out of 3 East West Bank branches are located in low-to-moderate income areas. |
| · | $ |
| · | 7,171 small business loans made in 2019. |
| · | In 2019, East West Bank joined forces with Grameen America, a non-profit microfinance organization, to establish a new Grameen America branch in Long Beach, California to provide capital to low-income female entrepreneurs in underserved communities. |
| · | $ |
| · | Over |
7
Summary Information about Director Nominees
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee and continuing director as of March 31, 2018.2020.
| Name | Age | Director | Primary Occupation | A | B | C | E | N | R | Age | Director Since
| Primary Occupation | A | B | C | E | N | R | |||||||||
| Molly Campbell* | 57 | 2014 | Director of the Port Department, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
| ü FE | 59 | 2014 | Retired, Former Director of the Port Department of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey | ü FE | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Iris S. Chan* | 72 | 2010 | CEO of Ameriway
| ü | ü RE | 74 | 2010 | CEO of Ameriway
| ü Chair | ü RE | |||||||||||||||||
Archana Deskus*
| 54 | 2019 | Chief Information Officer, Intel Corporation | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rudolph I. Estrada* (LD) | 70 | 2005 | CEO of Estradagy Business Advisors
| ü | ü Chair
| ü | ü | ü | ü Chair
| 72 | 2005 | CEO of Estradagy Business Advisors | ü | ü | ü | ü Chair | |||||||||||
| Paul H. Irving* | 65 | 2010 | Chairman of the Milken Institute Center for the Future of Aging
| ü | ü | 67 | 2010 | Chairman of the Milken Institute’s Center for the Future of Aging | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||
| Herman Y. Li* | 65 | 1998 | Chairman of C&L Restaurant Group, Inc.
| ü | ü Chair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jack C. Liu* | 59 | 1998 | Senior Attorney, Alliance International Law Offices
| ü Chair | ü | 61 | 1998 | Senior Attorney, Alliance International Law Offices
| ü Chair | ü | |||||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 59 | 1991 | Chairman of the Board and CEO of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank
| ü Chair | 61 | 1991 | Chairman of the Board and CEO of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank | ü Chair | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lester M. Sussman* | 63 | 2015 | Senior Practice Director of Resources Global Professionals
| ü Chair FE | ü RE | 65 | 2015 | Vice President, Advisory Services of Resources Global Professionals
| ü Chair FE | ü RE | |||||||||||||||||
A = Audit Committee;B = BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Steering Committee;C = Compensation Committee;E = Executive Committee;
N = Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee;R = Risk Oversight Committee
* = Independent Director;LD= Lead Director;FE = Audit Committee Financial Expert;RE = Risk Oversight Committee Risk Expert
8
Director Dashboard
Corporate Governance Highlights
We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders and strengthens our Board and management accountability. Highlights of our corporate governance practices include:
| · |
| · | We have a long-standing commitment to diversity in our organization, as evidenced by our Board. |
| · | Our Board has adopted and published guidelines for a Lead Director position to guide the Company’s oversight, which includes conducting regular sessions of independent directors. |
| · | The Audit, BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance, Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance, and Risk Oversight Committees are restricted to independent |
| · | In |
| · | The annual election of |
| · | We have adopted formal Corporate Governance Guidelines reflecting our commitment to sound corporate governance. |
| · | We have a Code of Conduct for all |
| · | We |
| · | We have |
| · | Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits pledging or hedging of |
| · | We conduct an annual “Say-on-Pay” vote. |
| · | We do not have a stockholder rights plan or a “poison pill” provision that some companies adopt to make it difficult for an acquirer to obtain control without the approval of the Company’s board. |
| · | Stockholders may call special meetings and the ownership threshold for stockholders to call a special meeting is 10% of our |
| The Company has a continuing education program for its directors. |
| · | The Board regularly evaluates, at least annually, its overall effectiveness, committee assignments, Board refreshment, and governance and risk management practices. |
9
Executive Compensation Highlights
We measure executive officer performance by evaluating both the achievement of specific financial goals and the long-term performance of the Company. We align the pay and performance of our executivesexecutive officers to the success of our business and the interests of our stockholders. We do this by providing our executive officers short-term cash bonuses tied to our revenuefinancial and strategic performance and also by granting long-term equity awards. The Company has a commitment to strong and sustainable governance and transparent compensation practices. The Company continuously reviews its compensation practices to ensure that they are effective. Our executive compensation practices include the following features:
| · |
| · | A substantial majority of the CEO’s compensation is long-term incentive compensation that is at risk and subject to performance metrics. |
| · | Our |
| · | We do not provide “single trigger” change in control payments to our Named Executive Officers. |
| · | No tax gross-ups for change in control benefits. |
| · | The Company has the right to “claw back” any bonus payment or incentive award from the Named Executive Officers in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements. |
| · | 100% of the |
| · | Our compensation consultants are independent from management. |
| · | We have transparent, objective peer and market comparative financial performance metrics aligned with stockholder interests. |
| · | We |
| · | Our Board and Compensation Committee annually review and |
10
VOTING INFORMATION AND QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE
The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this Proxy Statement. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully.
What matters am I voting on?
You will be voting on:
| · | The election of eight |
| · |
| · | A proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, |
| · | Any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. |
How does the Board recommend I vote on these proposals?
The Board recommends a vote:
| · | FOR the election of the nominees as |
| · | FOR approval, on |
| · | FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, |
Who is entitled to vote?
Holders of our common stock as of the close of business on March 29, 201823, 2020 (the “Record Date”), may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, we had 144,872,525142,006,764 shares of common stock outstanding. In deciding all matters at the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on the Record Date. We do not have cumulative voting rights for the election of directors.
| · | Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and this Proxy Statement was provided to you directly by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to delegate your voting directly to the individuals listed on the Proxy or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. |
| · | Beneficial Owner: Street Name Stockholders. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, or a street name stockholder, and this Proxy Statement was forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee, who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, because beneficial owners are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you follow your broker’s, bank’s or other nominee’s procedures for obtaining a legal proxy giving you the right to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. |
11
How do I vote?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may:
| · | instruct the proxy holder or holders on how to vote your shares by using the internet voting site or the toll-free telephone number |
| · | instruct the proxy holder or holders on how to vote your shares by completing and mailing your Proxy to the address indicated on your Proxy (if you received printed proxy materials), which must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting; or |
| · | vote by written ballot in person at the Annual Meeting. |
If you are a street name stockholder, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. The instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee will indicate the various methods by which you may vote, including whether internet or telephone voting is available.
| · | Brokerage firms and other intermediaries holding shares in street name for their customers are generally required to vote those shares in the manner directed by their customers.A “Broker Non-Vote” occurs when the entity holding shares in street name has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and either chooses not to vote those shares on a routine matter at the stockholders meeting or is not permitted to vote those shares on a non-routine |
| · | Absent timely direction from you, your broker, bank or other nominee will have discretion to vote your shares on “routine” matters only. The only “routine” matter to be decided at the Annual Meeting is the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 (Proposal 3). |
| · | Absent timely direction from you, your broker will not have discretion to vote on the other matters submitted for a vote at the Annual Meeting, which are the election of |
We intend to hold our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person. However, we are actively monitoring coronavirus (COVID-19) developments, and we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state and local governments are imposing and may continue to impose. For that reason, we reserve the right to change the date, time, and means of convening the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including through remote communications. If we take this step, we will announce the decision to do so in advance, and details will be issued by press release, posted on our website at http://investor.eastwestbank.com/ and filed with the SEC as additional soliciting materials. Please monitor our website for updated information. If you are planning to attend our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please check the website one week prior to the currently scheduled meeting date of May 19, 2020.
Can I change or revoke my vote?
Yes. Subject to any rules that your broker, bank or other nominee may have, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy before the Annual Meeting.
If you are a registered stockholder, you may change your vote by:
| · | entering a new vote via internet, smartphone or by telephone by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May |
| · | returning a later-dated Proxy which must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting; or |
| · | completing a written ballot in person at the Annual Meeting. |
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy by providing our Corporate Secretary with a written notice of revocation prior to your shares being voted at the Annual Meeting. The written notice of revocation may be hand delivered to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, or mailed to and received by East West Bancorp at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
If you are a street name stockholder, you may change your vote by:
| · | submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee pursuant to instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee; or |
| · | completing a written ballot at the Annual Meeting; provided you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares. |
If you are a street name stockholder, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares to find out how to revoke your proxy.
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our Board. The persons named in the Proxy have been designated as proxy holders. When Proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by those Proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board as described above. If any matter not described in the Proxy Statement is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy.
How many votes are needed for approval of each matter?
| · | Proposal 1—Election of Directors: The Company’s |
| · | Proposal 2—Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation: The non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation |
| · | Proposal 3—Ratification of Auditors: The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 must receive the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. You may vote “For,” “Against,” or “Abstain” with respect to this proposal. Abstentions are considered votes cast and thus will have the same effect as a vote “Against” the proposal. Broker Non-Votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of this Proposal. We do not expect to receive Broker Non-Votes for this Proposal as brokers, banks and other nominees will have discretionary authority to vote shares for which street name stockholders do not provide voting instructions. |
Are there any other matters presented for action at the Annual Meeting?
The enclosed Proxy confers discretionary authority with respect to matters incident to the Annual Meeting and any other proposals of which management did not have notice at least 45 days prior to the date on which the Company mailed its proxy material for last year’s annual meeting of stockholders. As of the date hereof, management is not aware of any other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Proxies solicited hereby will be voted by the Proxy holders in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.Board.
What happens if a director nominee does not receive a majority vote?
In an uncontested election, any Directordirector nominee who receives a greater number of “Withhold”“Against” votes than votes “For” the nominee’s election shall immediately tender to the Board his or her offer to resign from the Board. The Board, after taking into consideration the recommendation of the Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, will determine whether or not to accept the
13
resignation of any nominee for director who receives a greater number of “Withhold”“Against” votes than votes “For” the nominee’s election. In the event of a contested election, the director nominees who receive the largest number of votes cast “For” their election will be elected as directors.
What is a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our Bylaws and Delaware law. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes will be treated as shares present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting? Who pays for the solicitation?
The Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. All expenses associated with this solicitation will be borne by us. Although there is no formal agreement to do so, we may reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their reasonable expense in forwarding these proxy materials to their principals. Proxies will be solicited principally through the mail, buthowever, our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies personally, by telephone or via the internet. Directors, officers and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies.
Is my vote confidential?
Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 24, 201819, 2020
Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC rules related to the availability of proxy materials, the Company has made its Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K available on the Company’s corporate website at www.eastwestbank.com/annual. Website addresses referenced herein are intended to provide inactive, textual references only, and the information on these websites is not part of this Proxy Statement.
I share an address with another stockholder, and we received multiple copies of the proxy materials. How can we obtain a single copy of the proxy materials?
Stockholders who share an address and receive multiple copies of our proxy materials can request to receive a single copy in the future. To receive a single copy of the proxy materials, stockholders may contact us at:
East West Bancorp, Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor
Pasadena, California 91101
(626) 768-6000
Stockholders who hold shares in street name may contact their broker, bank, or other nominee to request information about “householding” (providing one copy of this Proxy Statement for all stockholders residing at one address).
In some cases, stockholders who hold their shares in street name and who share the same surname and address may receive only one copy of the proxy materials. If you would like to have a separate copy of the proxy materials mailed to you or receive separate copies of future mailings, please submit your request to your broker, bank or other nominee. We will deliver such additional copies promptly upon receipt of such request.
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We will disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to include them in the Form 8-K, we will file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as final results become available.
14
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Proposal Snapshot
·What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked to elect eight
·Voting recommendation:
FOR the election of each director nominee.
|
Board of Directors and Nominees
Our business is managed under the direction of our Board, which is currently composed of nine (9)eight members. The BoardOne director, Herman Li, is nominating eight (8) members to serve a one-year term. Keith W. Renken, a board member since 2000, is retiring after 22 years of service and leadership and is not standing for re-election in 2018.re-election. The Board has determinedis nominating the eight director nominees discussed below to fixserve a one-year term, each of whom was recommended for reelection by the size of the Board at eight (8) members following Mr. Renken’s retirement from the Board.Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.
We seek directors with strong reputation and experience in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our businesses, particularly industries and growth segments that we serve, as well as key geographic markets where we operate. Each of the nominees for director holds or has held senior executive positions in financial services and/or large, complex organizations, and has operating experience that meets this objective. In these positions, they have also gained experience in core management skills, such as strategic and financial planning, corporate governance, risk management, and leadership development, as further described below.
We also believe that each of the nominees has other key attributes that are important to an effective Board, including: integrity and high ethical standards; sound judgment; analytical skills; the ability to engage management and each other in a constructive and collaborative fashion; diversity of origin, background, experience, and thought; and the commitment to devote significant time and energy to service on the Board and its Committees.
The proposed nominees collectively bring a wide range of experience to the Board with a focus on our core business of being a financial bridge between the U.S. and Greater China. In addition, the proposed nominees reflect our heritage and continuingleading role as one of the most diverse financial institutions in the country and the largest FDIC-insured minority depository institution.institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Our Board is representative of the rich ethnic diversity and multiculturalism that exists in the United States and in California, where we are headquartered. Of the eight persons being nominated as directors, 75% or six are members of the nominees are ethnic/racial minorities. The minority director nominees include fourgroups, including three Asian-Americans, one African-American, one Hispanic-American and one Hispanic-American.Indian-American. Furthermore, we are committed to gender diversity on the boardBoard, and in management roles, and twothree of theour eight director nominees are women. We believe the director nominees represent one of the most diverse boards of publicly traded financial institutions in the United States.U.S.
The following table presents certain information with respect to the Board’s nominees for director. All directorsdirector nominees of the Company are also directors of East Westthe Bank, (the “Bank”), the Company’s principal subsidiary. All of the nominees have indicated their willingness to serve. Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board, subject to restrictions set forth in their employment agreements. For further details, see the “Other Compensation Policies and Information—Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this Proxy Statement.
15
| Director Nominees | Age | Year First Appointed | Committee Memberships | Current Term Expires | ||||
| Molly Campbell * | 57 | 2014 | A (FE) | 2017 | ||||
| Iris S. Chan * | 72 | 2010 | B, R (RE) | 2017 | ||||
| Rudolph I. Estrada (LD)* | 70 | 2005 | A, B (Chair), C, E, N, R (Chair) | 2017 | ||||
| Paul H. Irving * | 65 | 2010 | B, N | 2017 | ||||
| Herman Y. Li * | 65 | 1998 | B, N (Chair) | 2017 | ||||
| Jack Liu * | 59 | 1998 | C (Chair), R | 2017 | ||||
| Dominic Ng | 59 | 1991 | E (Chair) | 2017 | ||||
| Lester M. Sussman * | 63 | 2015 | A (FE and Chair), R (RE) | 2017 |
| Director Nominees | Age | Year First Appointed | Committee Memberships | Current Term Expires |
| Molly Campbell * | 59 | 2014 | A (FE), C | 2020 |
| Iris S. Chan * | 74 | 2010 | B (Chair), R (RE) | 2020 |
| Archana Deskus * | 54 | 2019 | R | 2020 |
| Rudolph I. Estrada (LD)* | 72 | 2005 | A, B, E, R (Chair) | 2020 |
| Paul H. Irving * | 67 | 2010 | A, B, N | 2020 |
| Jack C. Liu * | 61 | 1998 | C (Chair), N | 2020 |
| Dominic Ng | 61 | 1991 | E (Chair) | 2020 |
| Lester M. Sussman * | 65 | 2015 | A (FE and Chair), R (RE) | 2020 |
A = Audit Committee;B = BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Steering Committee;C = Compensation Committee;E = Executive Committee;
N = Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee;R = Risk Oversight Committee
* = Independent Director;LD= Lead Director;FE = Audit Committee Financial Expert;RE = Risk Oversight Committee Risk Expert
None of the Directordirector nominees were selected pursuant to any arrangement or understanding, other than with the directors and executive officers of the Company acting within their capacity as such. There are no family relationships among directors or executive officers of the Company. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there were no directorships held by any director with a company which has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other than Mr. Ng, who is a director of Mattel, Inc. and Mr. Irving,, Ms. Campbell, who is a director of Pharos Capital BDC,Granite Construction Inc. and Ms. Deskus who is a director of Cognizant.
We have no reason to believe that any of the Directordirector nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. However, if any nominee should become unable for any reason or unwilling for good cause to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors.
Director Nominee Qualifications and Experience
Our Directordirector nominees bring a balance of relevant skills to our BoardroomBoard including:
| · | High Level of Financial Experience |
| · | Relevant Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience |
| · | Broad International Exposure/Emerging Market Experience |
| · | Diversity in Gender, Race and Ethnicity |
| · | Social and Corporate Governance Experience |
| · | Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s |
| · | Marketing Experience |
| · | Innovation/Technology Experience |
| · | Governmental or Geopolitical Expertise |
| · | Risk Oversight/Management Expertise |
| · | Information Technology, Cybersecurity and Privacy Expertise |
Each of the Directordirector nominees currently serves on the Board and wasBoard. All were elected by the stockholders at the 2017May 21, 2019 annual meeting of Stockholders.Stockholders except for Ms. Deskus, who joined the Board in October of 2019. If elected, each nominee will hold office until the 20192021 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
The principal occupation during the past five years of each Directordirector nominee is set forth below. Included in each Directordirector nominee’s biography below is an assessment of the specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experience of the nominee based on the qualifications described above. All Directordirector nominees have held their present positions for at least five years, unless otherwise stated.
16
| Director Qualifications and Experience | ||
Independent
Retired, Former Director of the Port Department of the Port Authority of New York and New
Director Since 2014
Board Committees: · Audit · Compensation
| Molly Campbell
| |
Independent
CEO of Ameriway
Director Since 2010
Board Committees: · BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance (Chair) · Risk Oversight
|
| Iris S. Chanis currently the CEO of Ameriway, which she founded in 1989. Ameriway focuses on
Ms. Chan is involved in many community and professional organizations. Currently, she is on the board of governors of the San Francisco Symphony. Ms. Chan has received various awards and recognition for her work. In 2007 and 2008, she was named one of the “25 Most Powerful Women in Banking” by American Banker magazine. Ms. Chan brings to the Board a deep understanding of commercial lending and credit risk oversight, in addition to her perspectives on U.S.–Asia cross-border trade and investment. The Company believes that Ms. Chan’s high-level executive and oversight experience in the financial services industry, including in
|
Independent Chief Information Officer, Intel Corporation Director Since 2019 Board Committees: · Risk Oversight | Archana Deskusis currently the Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) of Intel Corporation. Since January 2020, she has been responsible for leading Intel’s global information technology (“IT”) operations and managing a staff of approximately 5,000 employees. From 2017 through 2019, she was Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s CIO, responsible for its IT infrastructure and technology resources. Prior to joining Hewlett Packard Enterprises, Ms. Deskus served as the CIO at Baker Hughes from 2013 to 2017. Ms. Deskus has also held CIO roles at Ingersoll-Rand, Timex Corporation, and United Technologies Corporation, giving her wide perspectives across various industries. Ms. Deskus currently serves on the Board of Directors of Cognizant. In addition to her business experiences, Ms. Deskus has served on the boards of private and non-profit organizations including Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas, Tavant Technologies, and American Eagle Federal Credit Union. The Company believes that Ms. Deskus’ 30 years of information technology experience, as well as her insight and thought leadership in risk management, cyber security and innovation, well qualifies her to serve on our Board. | |
17
Independent
Lead Director, East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank; CEO of Estradagy Business Advisors
Director Since 2005
Board Committees: · Audit · BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance
· Executive
· Risk Oversight (Chair)
| Rudolph I. Estradais the Lead Director of the Board of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank. Mr. Estrada is the Chief Executive Officer of Estradagy Business Advisors, a business and banking advisory group that serves small and medium-sized businesses. He has also served as a
|
Independent
Chairman of the Milken
Director Since 2010
Board Committees: · Audit · BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance · Nominating/Corporate Governance | Paul H. Irvingis chairman of the Milken
|
|
|
Independent
Senior Attorney, Alliance International Law Offices
Director Since 1998
Board Committees: · Compensation (Chair) · Nominating/Corporate Governance | Jack C. Liuis a senior attorney with Alliance International Law Offices. Prior to
Mr. Liu is admitted to practice law in the jurisdictions of California and Washington, D.C.
|
Chairman of the Board and CEO of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank
Director Since 1991
Board Committees: · Executive (Chair) |
Dominic Ng is Chairman of the Board and CEO of East West Bancorp, Inc. and East West Bank. Mr. Ng transformed East West Bank from a small savings and loan association with $600 million in assets and a market capitalization of $40 million in 1991, into the full-service international and commercial bank it is today - with
Mr. Ng currently serves on the board of Mattel, Inc. He is also a member of the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures and University of Southern
Mr. Ng
|
Independent
Director Since 2015
Board Committees: · Audit (Chair) · Risk Oversight
|
Lester M. Sussman
Mr. Sussman is a current member of the board of directors of the Braille Institute, as well as the board of directors of the
|
19
We have adopted formal Corporate Governance Guidelines reflecting our commitment to sound corporate governance. These principles are essential to running the Company’s business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. In addition, we have also adopted a Code of Conduct. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Conduct, our Environmental and Social Policy Framework and information about other governance matters of interest to investors, are available through our website at www.eastwestbank.com by clicking onInvestor Relations — Corporate Information — Governance Documents.
Director Independence, Financial Experts and Risk Management Experience
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global SelectNasdaq Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”Nasdaq”). Under NASDAQ rules,Nasdaq listing standards, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the rules of NASDAQNasdaq listing standards require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees must be independent. Under these rules,listing standards, a director is independent only if the board of directors of a company makes an affirmative determination that the director has no material relationship with the company that would impair his or her independence.
Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.
Compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth under the rules of NASDAQ.Nasdaq listing standards. In order for a member of a listed company’s compensation committee to be considered independent for purposes of the rules of NASDAQ,Nasdaq, the listed company’s board of directors must consider all factors specifically relevant to determine whether a director has a relationship to the company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including but not limited to: (1) the source of compensation of the director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the company to the director; and (2) whether the director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.
Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director in accordance with the Exchange Act and NASDAQ rules.Nasdaq listing standards. Based on this review, our Board has determined that eight of our nine directors, or Mses. Campbell, Chan and ChanDeskus, and Messrs. Estrada, Irving, Li, Liu Renken and Sussman, representing eight of our nine directors, are independent as that term is defined under the rules of NASDAQ.Nasdaq listing standards. Accordingly, all members of the Company’s Audit, BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance, Compensation, Risk Oversight and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees satisfy the independence requirements of NASDAQ.Nasdaq. In making this determination, our Board considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances that the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock of each non-employee director, as well as relationships that our directors may have with customers and vendors.
The Board also reviewed whether any members of the Audit Committee meet the criteria to be considered a financial expert as defined by the SEC. Based on its review, the Board determined that two directors, Ms. Campbell and Messrs. Renken andMr. Sussman, qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under the applicable rules of the Audit Committee qualify as financial expertsSEC, by reason of their prior and current job experience.
Lastly, the Board has reviewed and determined that all members of the Risk Oversight Committee meet the independence requirement of the Federal Reserve’s Enhanced Prudential Standards andStandards. We continue to measure the Officeindependence of the Comptrollercommittee’s members against these standards even though the Federal Reserve last year amended these standards, consistent with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Reform, and Consumer Protection Act so that the risk management and risk committee requirements in the Enhanced Prudential Standards no longer apply to bank holding companies with less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets, which includes the Company. The members of the Currency’s risk oversight standards, andcommittee have a general understanding of risk management principles and practices relevant to the Company’s business. In addition, two members of the Risk Oversight Committee, Ms. Chan and Mr. Sussman, have particular experience identifying, assessing, and managing risk exposures of large, complex financial firms. Specifically, Ms. Chan has held high-level executive and management positions with Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citicorp for over 20 years. She is experienced with financial oversight and internal controls for large financial institutions, and has a deep understanding of commercial lending and credit risk oversight in a banking environment, in addition to insight into U.S.–Asia cross-border trade and investment. Mr. Sussman was an audit partner with Deloitte, where he held leadership positions including Partner in Charge of the Financial Services Group for the Pacific Southwest and Partner in Charge of Capital Markets for the West Region. Moreover, his work at RGP involves providing corporate governance, risk management and compliance services to clients globally. Accordingly, Ms. Chan’s and Mr. Sussman’s experience in risk management are commensurate with the Company’s structure, risk profile, complexity, activities and size and, we believe, qualify them as risk experts under the Federal Reserve’s Enhanced Prudential Standards.
Standards
20
The Board has responsibility for the oversight and evaluation of the Company’s risk management processes and, either as a whole or through its committees, regularly discusses with committees and management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on our business and the steps we take to manage them. The risk oversight process includes the Board receiving regular reports from its committees and members of senior management to enable the Board to understand the Company’s risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies with respect to areas of potential material risk. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks, as further described in “Board Meetings and Committees” below, and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through reports about such risks. Matters of significant strategic risk are considered by the Board as a whole.
The Board leadership is structured with a Chairman/CEO position and also a Lead Director position.position that is elected by and from the independent members of the Board. The Board has determined that having the Company’s CEO also serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company. The designation of the CEO with the additional title as Chairman is important when dealing with overseas customers and dignitaries in the Greater China area, where these positions are typically combined. The Company has extensive experience and dealings with persons from this region who may have the perception that they are not dealing with the senior decision maker of the Company unless they are dealing with the Chairman. This structure also makes the best use of the CEO’s extensive knowledge of the Company and its industry, while fostering greater communication between management and the Board.
The Company’s governance structure provides for a strong Lead Director role. The powers and duties of a Chairman and a Lead Director differ only in that the Chairman presides over the normal business portion of the meetings of the Board. Since the Lead Director may call for an executive session of independent directors at any time, and has joint control over the agenda and the information provided to directors for Board meetings, the Board believes that it is able to have an open exchange of views, or address any issues independent of the Chairman. In addition, much of the work of the Board is conducted through its committees, and the Chairman is not a member of any committee, other than the Executive Committee.
Among other things, the Lead Director is required to:
| · | lead executive sessions of the Board’s independent or non-management directors, and preside at any session of the Board where the Chairman is not present; |
| · | act as a regular communication channel between the independent directors and the CEO; |
| · | set the Board’s agenda jointly with the CEO; |
| · | approve Board meeting schedules to ensure sufficient time to discuss all agenda items; |
| · | oversee the scope, quantity and timing of the flow of information from management to the Board; |
| · | represent the independent directors in discussions with major stockholders regarding their concerns and expectations; |
| · | call special Board meetings or special meetings of the independent directors, as needed; |
| · | approve the retention of consultants who report directly to the Board; |
| · | advise the independent Board committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and responsibilities to the Board; and |
| · | review stockholder communications addressed to the full Board or to the Lead Director. |
The Company does not have a policy requiring mandatory separation of the roles of CEO and the Chairman of the Board. The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to instead make a determination regarding the separate roles of CEO and Board Chairman on a regular basis based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership composition of the Board at the time. The determination not to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO at this time also recognizes the strong independence of the Board with 7seven of the 8eight continuing directors being independent.
Director Education and Self-Assessment
The Company has a continuing education program to assist Directorsdirectors in further developing their skills and knowledge to better perform their duties. This includes presentations made as part of regular Board and Committee meetings by qualified persons on various topics. For example, in 2017,2019, our Board received in-Company training on topics ranging from Identity Theft,BSA/AML and OFAC requirements, privacy and identity theft red flag training, fair lending and redlining, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, BSA/AML and OFAC requirements, Fair Lending,cybersecurity, the California Consumer Privacy Sales Practices, Cybersecurity,Act of 2018 and updates on applicable state, federal and Chinese laws and regulations. In 2017,addition, our directors have external continuing education requirements. In 2019, members of our Board also participated in external director continuing education programs including those offered by the California Bankers Association – FDIC 2017 Directors College, the California Community Banking Network – FDIC Directors College, and the National Association of Corporate Directors. Directors (“NACD”), Deloitte, KPMG, the Western Bankers Association – FDIC Director’s College, and the Banker’s Compliance Group on topics such as cybersecurity oversight and governance, corporate governance, enterprise risk management, Environmental Social Governance (“ESG”) risk management, director roles in credit risk management and balance sheet management, audit functions and oversight, and transformational technologies. One member of our Risk Oversight Committee, Mr. Sussman, earned the CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight issued by the CERT Division of the
21
Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University in partnership with the NACD. In addition, Messrs. Estrada and Liu are active members of the NACD and are both NACD Leadership Fellows. The Board also regularly evaluates, at least annually, its overall effectiveness, Committeecommittee assignments, Board refreshment, and governance and risk management practices.
The business of the Board is conducted through its meetings, as well as through meetings of its committees. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Board held four regularly scheduled meetings and a multi-day retreat. There were also 3723 meetings of Board committees during that year.2019. All Directorsdirectors attended all Board meetings and the retreat. In addition, the Directorsdirectors attended 97%100% of the meetings for the committees on which they served as members. The policy of the Company is to encourage all director nominees to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All Directorsdirectors were in attendance at the 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders.
Our Board has six standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”)/Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) Compliance Risk Management Steering Committee (“BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee”),Committee, a Compensation Committee, an Executive Committee, a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and a Risk Oversight Committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board. The standing committees report on their deliberations and actions at each full Board meeting. Each of the committees has the authority to engage outside experts, advisors and counsel to the extent it considers appropriate to assist the committee in its work.
Each of the standing committees operates under a written charter. These charters can be found on the Company’s website atwww.eastwestbank.com by clicking onInvestor Relations — Corporate Information — Corporate Documents. Set forth below is a description of the standing committees of the Board.
Audit Committee
The current members of our Audit Committee are Ms. Campbell and Messrs. Estrada, RenkenIrving and Sussman.Sussman, with Mr. Sussman serving as chair. Our Board has determined that each of the members of our Audit Committee satisfies the requirements for independence and financial literacy under the rules and regulations of NASDAQNasdaq and the SEC. Our Board has also determined that threetwo of the members, Ms. Campbell and Messrs. Renken andMr. Sussman, are “audit committee financial expertsexperts” as contemplated bydefined under the applicable rules of the SEC implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Mr. Sussman serves as chair.SEC. The Audit Committee held ninefive meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
Our Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting process and the audit of our financial statements, and assists our Board in monitoring our financial systems and our legal and regulatory compliance. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| · | appointing, compensating and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | approving engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm to render any audit or permissible non-audit services; |
| · | reviewing the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | reviewing the scope and results of the internal audits; reviewing the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures; |
| · | reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual audit; |
| · | resolving any disagreements between management and the independent registered public accounting firm regarding financial reporting; |
| · | reviewing our critical accounting policies and practices; |
| · | reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; |
| · | establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of accounting and auditing related complaints and concerns; and |
| · | preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement. |
The Bank also has an Audit Committee, which consists of the same directors as the Company’s Audit Committee. The Bank’s Audit Committee generally meets jointly with the Company’s Audit Committee.
22
BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee
In December 2015, theThe Board created the BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee to provide governance for the enterprise-wide BSA/AML & OFAC program framework and focused oversight of the Company’s program enhancements. Active oversight of BSA/AML & OFAC compliance risk was deemed necessary by the Board and senior management as effective compliance risk management is integral to the safety and soundness of the Bank. The current members of the BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee are Ms. Chan and Messrs. Li, Irving and Estrada. Mr. Estrada, serveswith Ms. Chan serving as chair. The Board has determined that each of the members of the BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee is independent under the rules and regulations of NASDAQ.Nasdaq. The BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee meets monthly and held twelvefive meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
The BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| · | reviewing and revising BSA/AML & OFAC policies and procedures; |
| · | monitoring BSA/AML & OFAC compliance risks across the Bank; and |
| · | reviewing assessments of the Program enhancements from Internal Audit, regulators and independent third parties including consultants. |
Compensation Committee
The current members of our Compensation Committee are Ms. Campbell and Messrs. Estrada, RenkenLi and Liu.Liu, with Mr. Liu serving as chair. One of the members, Mr. Li, has decided not to stand for re-election. Our Board has determined that each of the members of our Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of NASDAQ.Nasdaq. Our Board has also determined that the composition of our Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our Compensation Committee complies with, any applicable requirements of NASDAQNasdaq and SEC rules and regulations, as well as Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended. Mr. Liu serves as chair of our Compensation Committee.regulations. The Compensation Committee held sixfive meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
The Compensation Committee establishes and administers the executive compensation policies and plans of the Company. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
| · | annually reviewing and approving the primary components of compensation for our CEO and other executive officers (after receiving input from our CEO with respect to the other executive officers); |
| · | establishing, with the input from the full Board, performance goals for the CEO, and evaluating his performance in light of those goals; |
| · | evaluating the performance of our CEO and other executive officers in light of established goals and objectives; |
| · | periodically evaluating the competitiveness of the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers and our overall compensation plans; |
| · | reviewing and discussing with management the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us; |
| · | evaluating and making recommendations regarding director |
| · | administering our equity compensation plans for our employees and directors; and |
| · | producing the report by the compensation committee required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement. |
The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees, or, to the extent permitted under applicable laws, regulations and NASDAQNasdaq rules, to any other director, in each case to the extent the Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate.
The Bank also has a Compensation Committee, which consists of the same directors as the Company’s Compensation Committee. The Bank’s Compensation Committee generally meets jointly with the Company’s Compensation Committee. For a more comprehensive discussion on the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Framework and Process for Determining Executive Compensation – Our Compensation Philosophy” in this Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain the services and obtain the advice of external advisors, including compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. In evaluating firms to potentially provide services to the Compensation Committee, the Committee considers whether the firm provides any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee makes the decision to hire a consultant and provides direction as to its scope of work in its sole discretion. The Compensation Committee has appointed Willis Towers Watson and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC as its independent compensation consultant.consultants in 2019. The Compensation Committee uses its compensation consultantconsultants to:
23
| · | Assist and advise the Compensation Committee during its meetings; |
| · | Provide information based on third-party data and analysis of compensation programs at comparable financial institutions for the design and implementation of our executive and non-employee director compensation programs; |
| · | Compile and analyze compensation data for financial services companies; |
| · | Assist the Compensation Committee in forming a peer group; and |
| · | Provide independent information as to the reasonableness and appropriateness of the compensation levels and compensation programs of the Company relative to comparable financial services companies. |
Independent Compensation Consultant Evaluation
The Compensation Committee has evaluated the individual relationships of Willis Towers Watson and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC with both the Company and the Compensation Committee, including the provision of other services to the Company (there are none), fees paid by the Company as a percentage of the consultant’s total annual revenue (less than 1%), policies and procedures of the consultant to mitigate conflicts of interest, business or personal relationships of the consultant with any member of the Compensation Committee, any Company stock held by the consultant, and any business or personal relationships of the consultant with any executive officer of the Company. Based on these evaluations, the Compensation Committee concluded that Willis Towers Watson meetsand Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC meet the criteria of an independent advisor.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee currently consists of Messrs. Estrada, Li and Ng. Mr. Ng serves as chair. One of the members, Mr. Li, has decided not to stand for re-election. The Executive Committee is appointed by the Board to provide an efficient means of considering such matters and taking such actions, if any, as may require the attention of the Board in the interim between Board meetings. The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise certain powers of the Board during intervals between Board meetings. The Bank also has an Executive Committee, which consists of the same directors as the Company’s Executive Committee. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2017.2019.
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
The current members of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Estrada,Liu, Irving, and Li.Li, with Mr. Li serving as chair. Mr. Li, has decided not to stand for re-election. A new chair will be elected when Mr. Li’s term is over. Our Board has determined that each of the members of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of the independent director requirements of NASDAQ. Mr. Li serves as chair.Nasdaq. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee nominates persons for election as directors and reviews corporate governance matters. Among other things, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee members are responsible for:
| · | recommending to the Board a slate of nominees for election to the Board in accordance with the Company’s |
| · | recommending to the Board individuals to fill any vacancies on the Board occurring between annual meetings of stockholders; |
| · | recommending to the Board the directors who will serve on each committee of the Board; |
| · | developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles; |
| · | periodically reassessing the Company’s corporate governance principles; and |
| · | conducting an annual assessment of the Board’s structure and performance to determine whether it, its committees and its members are functioning effectively. |
The Bank also has a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, which consists of the same directors as the Company’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Bank’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee generally meets jointly with the Company’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.
Risk Oversight Committee
The current members of the Risk Oversight Committee are Ms.Mses. Chan and Deskus, and Messrs. Sussman and Estrada, Liu and Sussman.with Mr. Estrada servesserving as chair. The Risk Oversight Committee held sixfour meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Risk Oversight Committee is independent as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and regulations promulgated thereunder and NASDAQNasdaq rules. In addition, all the members of the Risk Oversight Committee meet
24
the independence requirement of the Enhanced Prudential Standards and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s(as well as other regulatory risk oversight standardsstandards) as theythe members are not and have not been officers or employees of the Company within the previous three years and are not related to any officers or employees of the Company. Our Board also has determined that Mr. Estrada meets the requirements in the Enhanced Prudential Standards for the independence of chairman of the Risk Oversight Committee. The Federal Reserve last year amended the Enhanced Prudential Standards such that the risk management and risk committee requirements do not apply to bank holding companies with less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets, which includes the Company, but we continue to apply these standards to the Risk Oversight Committee.
The Risk Oversight Committee has been appointed by the Board to provide focused oversight of the Company’s identified enterprise risk categories, which include: credit, interest rate,capital, liquidity, operational, information technology, human capital,market, compliance, legal, strategic, reputation, and international.reputation. The Board believes an effective enterprise risk management system is necessary to ensure the successful, safe and sound management of the Bank. Among other things, our Risk Oversight Committee is required to:
| · | be responsible for the Company’s risk management standards; |
| · | monitor the Company’s risk exposure in the identified enterprise risk categories; |
| · | timely identify the material risks that the Company faces; |
| · | communicate necessary information on material risks to senior management and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant Board committee; |
| · | oversee the Company’s risk management framework and implement responsive risk management strategies appropriate to the Company’s risk profile; and |
| · | integrate risk management into the Company’s decision-making. |
In addition, the Company’s Chief Risk Officer works directly with the Risk Oversight Committee and the CEO. The Bank also has a Risk Oversight Committee, which consists of the same directors as the Company’s Risk Oversight Committee. The Bank’s Risk Oversight Committee generally meets jointly with the Company’s Risk Oversight Committee.
The policy of the Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted stockholder nominations for Board candidacy as described below in “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors.” In evaluating these nominations, the Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and to meet the membership criteria set forth under “Director Nominee Qualifications and Experience” discussed above. Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be addressed to:
Corporate Secretary
East West Bancorp, Inc.
135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor
Pasadena, California 91101
In addition, nominations for directors may be made by any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors if proper notice is given in accordance with the Bylaws. Notice of a stockholder’s intention to make any nominations must be made in writing and must be delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than thirty (30) calendar days or more than sixty (60) calendar days prior to the meeting at which directors are to be elected. However, in the event that less than forty (40) calendar days’ notice of the meeting is given to stockholders, notice by the stockholder, to be timely, must be delivered not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the mailing date of the meeting notice to stockholders.stockholders or such public disclosure was made. The notification shall contain the following information:
| · | all information about each proposed nominee that would be required in a proxy solicitation under the federal proxy rules; |
| · | the name and record address of the stockholder, as they appear on the Company’s books; |
| · | a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the stockholder; and |
| · | a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person named in the notice. |
We may disregard nominations not made in accordance with the requirements in the Bylaws.
25
Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership criteria that apply to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s nominees for a position on the Board. Under these criteria, members of the Board should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values. They should have broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, finance, accounting, law or public interest, as well as a high level of financial experience, extensive knowledge of the Company’s business and/or industry, risk oversight/management expertise and broad international exposure/Greater China experience. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee strives to nominate director candidates with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills, and expertise to oversee the Company’s businesses. In addition, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee seeks to nominate directors with a diversity of origin, background and experience, including with respect to race, ethnicity, gender and thought.national origin. All directors should be committed to enhancing stockholder value and should have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience. Their service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform responsibly all director duties.
The Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director and regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board, and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Committee considers various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year. As described above, the Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, those materials are forwarded to the Committee. In evaluating the nominations, the Nominating / Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board.
Our Board welcomes suggestions and comments from stockholders. All stockholders are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of stockholders where senior management and representatives from our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as members of the Board, will be available to answer questions. Stockholders may also send written communications to the Board by writing to the Secretary of the Board at East West Bancorp, Inc., 135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101. All communications (other than commercial communications soliciting the sale of goods or services to, or employment with, the Company or directors of the Company) will be directed to the appropriate committee, the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Director, or to any individual director specified in the communication, as applicable.
The independent directors generally meet in executive sessions without management or any of the other non-independentemployee directors present at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The sessions are chaired by the Lead Director. Any director can request an additional executive session to be scheduled.
All directors and executive officers are required to own the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock to further align director’sthe financial interests of our directors and management’s financial interestsmanagement with those of our stockholders. The Company’s stock ownership guidelinesStock Ownership Guidelines for directors and officersNamed Executive Officers are posted on the Company’s website, which can be found atwww.eastwestbank.com by clicking onInvestor Relations — Corporate Information — Governance Documents.
Named Executive officersOfficers have additional holding requirements for stock acquired as part of their compensation. The majorityNamed Executive Officers shall hold until retirement at least 51% of any stock acquired upon the exercise of stock options (net of taxes and net of the shares acquiredgrant price paid) and at least 51% of any stock received upon vesting (net of taxes) have to be held until retirement. Under these guidelines, if the holding requirement is greater than the guidelines set forth above for the directors and executive officers, the higher holding requirements apply and an executive may have holding requirements longer than the above guidelines.of restricted stock or restricted stock units
ExecutiveNo Pledging/Hedging of Company Securities
Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, directors, officers and employees may not pledge or engage in hedging strategies, including those designed to hedge or offset, decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities granted as compensation or held directly or indirectly by such person. Additionally, directors, officers and employees may not sell short or trade derivatives involving the Company’s securities.
26
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide guidance for addressing actual or potential conflicts of interests, including those that may arise from transactions and relationships between the Company and its executive officers or directors. In order to provide further clarity and guidance on these matters, the Company has adopted a written policy regarding the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions.
The policy generally provides that the Audit Committee will review and approve in advance, or will ratify, all related party transactions between the Company and our directors, director nominees, executive officers, and persons known by the Company to own more than 5% of our Common Stock,common stock, and any of their immediate family members. Related party transactions include transactions or relationships involving the Company and amounts in excess of $120,000 and in which the above related parties had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the policy, the failure to approve a related party transaction in advance would not invalidate the transaction or violate the policy as long as it is submitted to the Audit Committee for review and ratification as promptly as practicable after entering into the transaction.
The Audit Committee works with our General Counsel in reviewing and considering whether any identified transactions or relationships are covered by the policy. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction or relationship that is covered by the policy, the Audit Committee considers, among other things:
| · | the identity of the parties involved in the transaction or relationship; |
| · | the facts and circumstances of the transaction or relationship, including the identity of the party involved; |
| · | the material facts of the transaction or relationship; |
| · | the benefits to the Company of the transaction or relationship; and |
| · | the terms of the transaction, including whether those terms are fair to the Company and are in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms with transactions or relationships with unrelated third parties. |
During 2017,2019, we did not enter into any related party transactions that required review, approval or ratification under our related party transaction policy. From time to time, we may lend money through our subsidiary, the Bank, to various directors and corporations or other entities in which a director may own a controlling interest. These loans (i) are made in the ordinary course of business, (ii) are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and (iii) do not involve more than a normal risk of collectability and do not present other unfavorable features. We do not have any loans to names executive officers.Named Executive Officers. None of our directors or executive officers, any associate or affiliate of those persons, or persons who beneficially owned more than 5% of our outstanding shares had any transactions or proposed transactions with us greater than $120,000 during the past year.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of directors. Employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are not compensated for service as a director of the Company or its subsidiaries and are excluded from the table below. The compensation received by Mr. Ng as an employee of the Company is shownprovided below in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
Director compensation is reviewed by the Compensation Committee of the Board and adjustments are generally considered every two years. The Committee will generally engage an outside independent consultant to review director compensation amounts and structure at the same group of peer banks used by the Compensation Committee to review the compensation of senior management. In 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant for this purpose.
In 2017,2019, non-employee directors received an annual cash retainer of $60,000$90,000 and an annual stock award of $120,000$110,000 of Common Stock.common stock. The Lead Director received an additional annual cash retainer of $70,000. The Board believes that the role of a Lead Director is essential to maintaining an independent leadership with respect to matters such as Board oversight, corporate strategy, management succession, internal controls, Board composition and functions and accountability to stockholders, and therefore the annual cash retainer paid for Lead Director’s additional service is justified. The essential duties of the Lead Director are explained in further detail in the section titled “Board Leadership Structure” above and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Lead Director also acts as the Board representative to the Company’s strategic advisory council of outside community leaders, and is charged with developing strategic networks of new business, for which he receives a cash retainer of $70,000 for such additional Board service.
The committee chairs received an additional annual cash retainer as follows: Audit $20,000; Compensation $20,000; Risk Oversight $20,000; and Nominating/Corporate Governance $12,500.$15,000 and BSA/AML & OFAC Compliance $15,000. Non-employee directors also received a meeting fee of $1,500 for each committee meeting attended.
27
The following table summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:2019:
20172019 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
| Name(1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards(1) | Total | |||||||||
| Molly Campbell | $ | 73,538 | $ | 119,962 | $ | 193,500 | ||||||
| Iris S. Chan | 85,538 | 119,962 | 205,500 | |||||||||
| Rudolph I. Estrada | 202,538 | 119,962 | 322,500 | |||||||||
| Paul H. Irving | 84,038 | 119,962 | 204,000 | |||||||||
| John M. Lee(2) | 1,500 | - | 1,500 | |||||||||
| Herman Y. Li | 95,038 | 119,962 | 215,000 | |||||||||
| Jack C. Liu | 98,038 | 119,962 | 218,000 | |||||||||
| Keith W. Renken | 81,038 | 119,962 | 201,000 | |||||||||
| Lester M. Sussman | 101,038 | 119,962 | 221,000 | |||||||||
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards(1) ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
| Molly Campbell | 105,039 | 109,961 | 215,000 | |||||||||
| Iris S. Chan | 118,539 | 109,961 | 228,500 | |||||||||
| Archana Deskus | 69,022 | (2) | 82,478 | (3) | 151,500 | |||||||
| Rudolph I. Estrada | 283,039 | 109,961 | 393,000 | |||||||||
| Paul H. Irving | 111,039 | 109,961 | 221,000 | |||||||||
| Herman Y. Li | 115,539 | 109,961 | 225,500 | |||||||||
| Jack C. Liu | 122,039 | 109,961 | 232,000 | |||||||||
| Lester M. Sussman | 123,539 | 109,961 | 233,500 | |||||||||
| (1) | The |
| (2) |
| (3) | Ms. Deskus also received an annual award of common stock prorated at 75%. The Company granted 1,893 shares of the Company's common stock to Ms. Deskus on October 27, 2019. The grant date fair value is based on the number of shares granted and the closing price of the company's stock on the grant date. The closing price of the Company's common stock was $43.57 on October 27, 2019. The grant date fair values are computed in |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ThisThe following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the structure and guiding principles of our 20172019 executive compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers,Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), as set forth below (“NEOs”).below.
20172019 Named Executive Officers
| Dominic Ng | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Irene H. Oh | Executive Vice President, |
| Catherine Zhou | Executive Vice President, Head of Consumer Banking and Digital Banking |
| Douglas P. Krause | Executive Vice President, |
| Andy Yen | Executive Vice President, Head of International and Commercial Banking |
The CD&A provides an overview of our:
| · | ||
| · | Executive compensation philosophy, and how we reinforce our business strategy through our pay programs; | |
| · | Alignment between business results and executive compensation through our pay program | |
| design. |
The Company’s long-term organizational objective is to build a “financial bridge” between the United StatesU.S. and Greater China. Achieving that objective will require the right set of leadership skills and talent. With over 130125 locations in the United StatesU.S. and Greater China, we have developed a talent strategy to identify, recruit and retain individuals who are highly knowledgeable about our customers’ specialized needs, while also well versed with the complexity of international business operations. At the same time, we actively seek to attract and retain talent who can lead and support our rapidly growing organization as we develop and further scale our business. Our compensation program, with its focus on measurable results for the Company while being sensitive to market conditions, is a critical tool we use to motivate talent and reinforce our commitment to align pay incentives with performance.
29
20172019 Performance Highlights
The Compensation Committee is pleased to report thatbelieves the Company achieved strongCompany’s 2019 financial performance again in 2017. We believe these results reflectreflects the continued successful alignment between the Company’s financial and organizational objectives and its executive compensation program.
· The Company continued to sustain its highly-ranked/industry-leading profitability. Our full year ·Key financial metrics in 2019: ·
· Total loans grew · Total deposits grew ·The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was a low 0.27%. |
In addition to consecutive years of growth in our business and profitability, our
| 1 | Balances as of December 31, 2019, as compared to December 31, 2018. Activity and performance for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. | |
| 2 | Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global. | |
| 3 | Total Deposits, includes deposits held for sale. | |
| 4 | Non-performing total assets excluding purchased credit-impaired loans. |
Our financial performance has also outpaced that of other banks on a relative basis. Specifically, our full year 2017 ROA of 1.41% and ROE of 13.71% were in the top 10% of publicly traded banks in the United States. In addition, weWe have maintained a consistently higher ROA and ROE for each of the last five (5) years relative to the median ROA and ROE achieved by (i) our compensation Peer Grouppeer group described on page 3335 of this Proxy (the “Peer Group”) as well as, and (ii) the banks comprising the KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index (“KRX”) for those years.. Overall, the Company ranked in the 8981thst percentile on ROA and 9387rdth percentile on ROE, relative to its Peer Group; and compared to the KRX, the Company ranked in the 8682thnd percentile on ROA and 94th percentile on ROE for 2017.2019.
In the charts above, median percentiles were used to represent the ROA and ROE year-end performance of the Peer Group (as defined on page 33 and excluding PrivateBancorp, Inc. in 2017 because it was acquired by another company) and the banks comprising the KRX as of each year end.KRX.1 The Company believes that ROA and ROE are important performance metrics because they measure the return the Company earned on its stockholders’ investment and the resources it deployed.
In addition, our performance continues to outpace that1 Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of our peers when other financial metricsS&P Global. ROA for years 2015 and 2016, and ROE for years 2015 through 2018, are applied. For example, we have had a higher total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative toslightly different from the median TSR achieved by ournumbers presented in last year’s proxy statement for the Peer Group and KRX because one peer bank was acquired by another company and excluded from the KRX over the last five years. TSR isPeer Group in 2018 and one peer bank revised its historical financial data.
31
We view total return to shareholders (“TSR”) as an important performance metric in stockholder value creation because it correlates directly with the Company’s stock price performance and dividends paid, and is therefore aligned with stockholder interests. In that regard,For 2019, our TSR was below the median TSR achieved by our Peer Group. Stock price performance in 2019 was impacted, in part, by geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China. The Company remains focused on achieving strong and consistent financial performance with the goal of the Company, year after year, has resulted indelivering long-term value for our stockholders.
The graph of total shareholder return assumes that on December 31, 2012,2014, $100 was invested in EWBCthe Company’s common stock, the Peer Group and the banks comprising the KRX, and that all dividends were reinvested. The information set forth above in the chart titled “Total Shareholder Return” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically requests that such information to be treated as soliciting material or specifically to be incorporated by reference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
32
Framework and Process for Determining Executive Compensation
Our Compensation Philosophy
We have designed our executive compensation program to attract and retain excellent managers, while also motivating them to deliver on our key financial and strategic goals. To support this objective, we included critical components in our program that are designed to:
| · | Support the achievement of the Company’s vision and business objectives; |
| · | Link a significant portion of total compensation to annual bonuses and performance-based compensation that reward our executives for meeting and exceeding goals in our key strategic focus areas; and |
| · | Motivate our executives to focus on strong long-term performance and stockholder value by allocating a significant portion of total pay to equity-based compensation. |
At the core of our compensation philosophy is aligning pay with measurable performance, and we reinforce this principal by how we structure compensation for our NEOs.
| Our Executive Compensation Program | |||
| What We Do | What We Don’t Do | ||
| ü | Place a substantial majority of executive compensation at risk and subject to performance metrics | × | Do not allow re-pricing of stock options without stockholder approval. |
| ü | Engage with and consider stockholder input in designing our executive pay programs | × | Do not provide “single trigger” change in control payments to executive officers |
| ü | Grant all of our NEOs’ total long-term incentives in performance-based restricted stock units | × | Do not permit hedging or pledging of |
| ü | Link annual NEO incentive pay to objective, pre-established financial performance goals | × | Do not permit gross-ups for excise or other taxes on severance or in connection with a change in control |
| ü | With oversight from the Compensation Committee, perform annual risk assessments to ensure that our compensation policies and programs are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company | ||
| ü | Engage an independent compensation consultant that will report solely to the Compensation Committee | ||
| ü | Maintain stock ownership requirements for all NEOs, including a requirement that a majority of stock grants (net of taxes) must be held until retirement | ||
| ü | Maintain a relevant peer group | ||
| ü | Maintain a clawback policy | ||
| ü | Listen to and engage with our stockholders regarding executive compensation decisions and philosophy. | ||
| ü | Conduct an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy | ||
Our compensation program benefits from the collective experience of our Compensation Committee and senior management team, who believe these compensation elements provide the proper alignment of incentives for our leaders while ensuring that we can create strong and sustainable stockholder value. Additionally, we meet with key stockholders to discuss their views on executive compensation and solicit feedback on our specific pay program.
33
Compensation Committee Responsibilities
As outlined in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Compensation Committee is responsible for developing and overseeing the Company’s executive compensation policies and programs. The goal of the Compensation Committee is to maintain compensation that is competitive within the markets in which we compete for talent and that reflects the long term interests of our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for:
| · | Developing the overall compensation strategy and policies for the Company; |
| · | Developing, evaluating and approving the goals and objectives of the compensation of the CEO; |
| · | Evaluating and approving the individual compensation, including bonus and equity incentive compensation and perquisites of each of the NEOs; |
| · | Establishing the guidelines for stock ownership for the executive management; |
| · | With input from the Head of Human Resources and Chief Risk Officer, reviewing our incentive compensation programs to evaluate and ensure that none of them encourage excessive risk; |
| · | Developing and maintaining a balanced compensation strategy of long-term and short-term incentives; |
| · | Retaining outside advisors, including compensation consultants, to provide professional counsel; |
| · | Annually, approving the Compensation Committee Report and our Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in our Proxy Statement; and |
| · | Providing reports to the Board on compensation matters. |
Compensation Committee Resources in Setting Pay
The Compensation Committee considers several resources, analytical tools and performance measures in determining compensation levels, as presented in the chart below:
| Compensation Committee Resource | Description | |
| Compensation Committee Consultant | The independent compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The independent compensation consultant also advises the Compensation Committee on trends and issues in executive compensation, and provides comparative compensation information for companies with which the Company competes for talent. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and oversee the work of the consultants, who do not provide services to Company management. | |
| The Company’s Human Resources Department | The Company’s Human Resources Department provides additional analysis, administrative support and counsel as requested by the Compensation Committee. | |
| The Compensation Committee has considered the annual “Say-on-Pay” vote and solicited input from a number of our larger stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that the proposed compensation structure with the modifications discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement is appropriate for the Company. |
34
Use of Peer Group
The Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, reviews at least annually the composition of peer companies against which the Company evaluates itself for compensation purposes. In determining the composition, financial institutions of comparable asset size were considered, using a combination of factors and considerations, including but not limited to other financial metrics (market capitalization and revenues), geographic locations, competition for talent, and business model and complexity of operations.
In March 2017,December 2019, the Compensation Committee approved a 2017our 2019 compensation peer group, thatwhich was identical to our 2018 compensation peer group, and consisted of 2524 banks substantially similar in market capitalization and asset size as the Company. AsOur Peer Group’s total assets range from $26 billion to $145 billion, with a median of the end of 2017, the Peer Group was revised to exclude PrivateBancorp, Inc. which was acquired by another company.$49.4 billion. As a result, the Peer Group was comprised of 24 banks as of December 31, 2017, with a2019, the median market capitalization of $6.4our Peer Group was $6.5 billion, with a range of $2.9 billion to $22.3 billion. With respect to total assets and a median asset size of $37.2 billion as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017,market capitalization, the Company ranked in the 6744th percentile and 5055th percentile, respectively, in terms of market capitalization and asset size, relative to the Peer Group.Group as of December 31, 2019.
The companies in the Peer Group are as follows:
· BankUnited, Inc. · BOK Financial Corporation · Comerica Inc. · Commerce Bancshares, Inc. · Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. · First Horizon National Corporation · First Republic Bank · Huntington Bancshares Inc. | · Investors Bancorp Inc. · KeyCorp · New York Community Bancorp, Inc. · Northern Trust Corporation · PacWest Bancorp · People’s United Financial, Inc. · Popular, Inc. · Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | · Regions Financial Corporation · Signature Bank · SVB Financial Group · Synovus Financial Corporation · Umpqua Holdings Corporation · Webster Financial Corporation · Western Alliance Bancorporation · Zions Bancorporation |
It is important to note that in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not solely rely on comparative data from the Peer Group. While comparisons can be useful in identifying general compensation trends and overall pay levels, the Compensation Committee recognizes there may be meaningful differences between us and our peer companies. The listing of NEOs, for example, may vary amongst our peer companies, with titles, compensation, and tenure that do not readily track with ours. The Compensation Committee uses the comparison data as a general indicator of market trends in executive compensation, but does not use it exclusively to set compensation levels for the CEO or other NEOs. In addition to peer data, the Compensation Committee also reviews individual and company performance, the position and tenure, responsibilities within the Company, and other factors to determine total compensation for the NEOs. See “Factors and Steps in Setting Pay” below for a more detailed discussion.
For purposes of determining long-term incentive awards, the Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant Willis Towers WatsonMeridian Compensation Partners, LLC determined it would be appropriate to continue usingbenchmarking to banks in the KRX (the “Long Term Performance Peer Group”). The continued use of this benchmark increases the transparency of the Company’s goal setting process by referring to a broadbroader index of financial institutions compiled by a third party.
Factors and Steps in Setting Pay
Compensation for the NEOs and certain other executive officers is typically evaluated and set by the Compensation Committee in the first quarter of each year, using the latest available competitive compensation data provided by the independent compensation consultant, peer data, as well as Company business departmentdepartments and individual performance data. An executive’s compensation is generally established after considering the following factors:
| · | Competitive pay data for similar jobs and responsibilities in the market. |
| · | The Company’s performance against financial measures. |
| · | The Company’s performance relative to strategic initiatives approved by the Compensation Committee. |
| · | The business climate, economic conditions and other factors. |
| · | The results of the most recent “Say-on-Pay” stockholder vote. |
As a rapidly growing organization, we encounter significant competition for top management talent – those individuals with the strategic vision, understanding of specialized industries, and the international banking experience necessary to continuesustain our growth. This challenge to attract and retain qualified personnel has been an important consideration in our compensation decisions, and we expect it will continue to be a significant consideration going forward.
For the CEO, the Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the CEO’s compensation, evaluates the CEO’s performance against those objectives and approves the CEO’s compensation level based on that evaluation. With assistance from the independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee also considers the Company’s Peer Group and other peer data on base pay, performance-based bonus targets and long-term incentive awards when setting compensation types and amounts for the CEO.
With input from the independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee separately reviews and discusses with the CEO his annual compensation recommendations for the other NEOs. A variety of factors help determine the final approved compensation amounts for the NEOs. For base salary adjustments, compensation data from our Peer Group and survey data for similar jobs and job levels are considered. For annual performance-based bonus payout and long-term incentive awards, the Compensation Committee considers the executive’s achievement against performance goals, along with individual contributions toward Company objectives, is taken into account.objectives.
The Compensation Committee does not benchmark to a particular percentile in determining target total direct compensation. Rather, it uses market peer proxy and survey data as a reference point, giving consideration to factors such as tenure, individual performance, any unique circumstances of the NEO’s position based on that individual’s responsibilities, market factors, succession considerations and retention considerations. We believe this approach drives higher realized compensation when our financial and stockholder performance is strong and less realized compensation when our financial and/or stockholder performance is lower.
Outreach to Stockholders
Our compensation policies and practices continue to evolve based on input from our stockholders, our review of correspondence submitted by stockholders to our Board and management, our review of market practice, our consideration of the advice of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, our review of reports issued by proxy advisory firms and the results of the most recent annual “Say on Pay”“Say-on-Pay” vote by stockholders.
The 2017 “Say on Pay” voteFor example, approximately 94.4% of the Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s 20162018 executive compensation by approximately 99.1%at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. The Compensation Committee views the high stockholder approval percentage as an indication that stockholders were generally satisfied with the executive compensation structure and its contributionhow it is designed to incentivize our strong financial performance.performance while balancing the risk inherent in our business. In addition to the annual “Say on Pay”“Say-on-Pay” vote, we meet with key stockholders to discuss their views on executive compensation and to solicit feedback on our specific pay program.
In 2017 and early 2018, the Chair of our Compensation Committee directed efforts to reach out to more than 50 of our largest stockholders to discuss our compensation program. Among other things, our Compensation Committee sought stockholder input regarding the 2017 compensation for our CEO. The stockholders who met with us indicated that they were pleased with our financial performance, and they did not express any concerns about executive compensation. Based in part on that feedback, the Compensation Committee believes the Company’s compensation approach is one of the more stockholder-centric compensation programs relative to our peers.36
Primary Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
With input from our stockholders, we have designed an executive compensation program that aligns pay with measurable performance onachievement of our corporate goals. In 2017, over 99%At the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 94.4% of the Say on Pay votes castCompany’s stockholders approved our 2016the Company’s 2018 executive compensation program.compensation. Based on the high approval percentage, and the feedback received from our stockholders, our 20172019 executive compensation program remained substantially similar to our 20162018 structure. The components of, and rationale for, each element of our executive compensation program are described in the table below.
| Compensation Components | ||||
| Base Salary | Description | Fixed compensation is delivered in cash on a regular basis. | ||
| Rationale | Market-aligned component of the overall pay package to provide a competitive level of fixed | |||
| Measurement Period | Ongoing | |||
| Performance-Based Bonus Plan | Description | |||
| Rationale | ·Motivates achievement of critical short-term financial and strategic results. ·Provides balance between financial metrics and strategic measures and ensures alignment across ·Provides appropriate line of sight for | |||
| Applicable Key Performance Metrics | ·Financial ·Strategic | |||
| Measurement Period | One Year | |||
Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Award –
| Description | |||
| Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) | Rationale | ·Focuses ·Establishes strong alignment with long-term stockholder interests through performance-based payouts in shares of our common stock. ·Enhances retention and drives stockholder value creation. | ||
| Applicable Key Performance Metrics | Financial | |||
| Measurement Period | Three Years | |||
37
Base Salary
Base salary is a fixed portion of compensation that is based on Peer Group salary data, salary surveys, and an executive’s skills, responsibilities, experience and relative importance to the Company. Actual, total salaries reflect an individual’s responsibilities within the Company, his or her job performance over time and other factors, such as the assessment by the Compensation Committee (and by the CEO, in the case of other NEOs) of an executive’s performance.
Performance-Based Bonus Plan
The Compensation Committee developed a cash incentive program (the “Performance-Based Bonus Plan”) to motivate and reward executives for achieving critical Company-wide financial metrics and strategic goals (collectively, “Corporate Goals”), and departmental or individual goals. The Corporate Goals are further divided into financial goals and strategic goals as described below. In general, payout from the Performance-Based Bonus Plan is based on the achievement of a combination of Corporate Goals and individual or departmental goals. For the CEO and the President and COO, however,However, payout from the Performance-Based Bonus Plan for the CEO is based entirely on the achievement of Corporate Goals. Of the amount in the Performance-Based Bonus Plan attributable to Corporate Goals, financial metrics make up 75%, whileconstitute 70% and the balanceremaining 30% is based on the attainment of the Company’s strategic goals. The bonus plan is structured so that the degree of attainment ofpercentage achieved for the strategic goals cannot be higher thanexceed the degree of attainment ofpercentage achieved for the financial goals, and therefore cannot increaseeven if the bonus otherwise payable to executives if only financial goals were considered.Company achieved the maximum level of performance for any of the strategic goals.
The 20172019 Performance-Based Bonus Plan was structured to balance financial rewards and business risks by including multiple Company performance measures. The Compensation Committee, at its discretion, reserves the right to adjust downward any bonus payments proposed for an NEO. Actual bonus payments are subject to the Company having satisfied any regulatory capital requirement administered by the federal banking agencies. Amounts paid out as bonuses are also subject to our Executive Recovery Policy, which provides for the clawback of executive compensation if certain triggering events occur. See “Clawbacks for anyAny Restatement; Executive Compensation Recovery Policy”. below.
20172019 Financial Metrics for Performance-Based Bonus
The 75% portionFinancial metrics comprise 70% of the Performance-Based Bonus Plan attributable to Corporate Goals is tied to the achievement of certain financial metrics.Goals. In 2017,2019, those metrics includeincluded the Company’s diluted operating earnings per share, and growth in total loans withand total deposits, cost of deposits, non-performing assets-to-total assets ratio, and net charge-off ratio. On an annual basis, the following weighting:Company evaluates the performance metrics used and modifies the metrics and the weightings as deemed appropriate. For 2019, the financial metrics as well as relative weightings were revised to reflect the Bank’s focus on deposit costs and maintaining high asset quality:
| · |
| · | A 10% weighting was assigned to |
| · | A 10% weighting was assigned to |
| · |
20172019 Financial Metrics Results: Diluted Earnings Per Share
The 20172019 financial objective included a 75%40% weighting based on achieving target diluted operating earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”) of $3.20,$5.05, an increase of 8% from 2016.2018. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if diluted earningsAdjusted EPS were at $3.09$4.75 per share, with no credit givenachievement for diluted earningsAdjusted EPS less than that amount. AAn Adjusted EPS of at least $5.35 would translate to a maximum achievement of 200% would be achieved if diluted. The target Adjusted EPS goal of $5.05 was determined based on the Company’s annual financial budget for 2019. Our 2019 Adjusted EPS of $4.84 resulted in 65% achievement of this performance goal. When calculating the earnings per share, we have historically excluded the impact of non-recurring items that are non-operating in nature.
Adjusted EPS is a financial measure not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which is referred to as a non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to the section titled “Item 7. MD&A — Supplemental Information-Explanation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the reasons why we use this measure and for reconciliations to the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Our reported earnings per share in 2019 were $3.32 or more.$4.61. For 2019, we excluded the $0.23 per share cumulative impact related to the reversal of certain previously claimed tax credits and associated impairment charges related to the Company’s investments in the DC Solar tax credit funds, as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. This related to a $5.4 million net pre-tax impairment charge (equivalent to $3.8 million after-tax) and $30.1 million in additional income tax expense to reverse certain previously claimed tax credits. (Refer toItem 7. MD&A
38
— Results of Operations — Income Taxes in Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion related to the Company’s investment in DC Solar.)
The Company recognizes that theEPS growth of diluted earnings per share is an important metric for stockholders to measure the Company’s performance. We believe that including this metric as a performance measurement aligns the interests of management and those of the stockholders. The target diluted earnings per share goal of $3.20 was determined based on the Company’s annual financial budget for 2017. This 2019 EPS goal was challenging as it required the Company to increase diluted earnings per shareEPS for the eighthtenth consecutive year and at a rate above what analysts projected for our Peer Group. We exceeded analysts’ expectations by achieving diluted earnings per share of $3.47 and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $3.46, higher than our target. When calculating the actual operating performance, we have historically excluded the impact of non-recurring items that are non-operating in nature. For 2017, we excluded the gains on sales of a commercial property and a business unit, and the nonrecurring impact from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Our 2017 adjusted diluted earnings per share of $3.46 represented an increase of 16% from 2016. Overall, our year-to-year increase in diluted earnings per share is at the 59th percentile relative to our Peer Group. Our above-target adjusted diluted earnings per share of $3.46 resulted in 200% achievement of this goal.
20172019 Financial Metrics Results: Growth in Total Loans
The 20172019 financial objectives included a 25%10% weighting based on achieving total loan growth inof 9.7%, equivalent to total loans reaching $35.5 billion. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if total loans grew 5.7%, with no achievement of the performance metric if total loan growth was less than that amount. Total loan growth of at least 13.7% would translate to $27.59a maximum achievement of 200%. As of December 31, 2019, total loans were $34.8 billion, or an increaserepresenting a growth of 8% year-over-year. 7.4% from 2018, resulting in a 71% achievement of this performance goal.
Net interest income is the largest component of revenue for mostmany banks, including our Bank and those in our Peer Group.Bank. As such, the ability to grow total loans, and therefore increase net interest income, is an important financial metric by which to measure performance. Our total loan growth of 7.4% in 2019 compares favorably to the median total loan growth for our Peer Group, which was 5.2%. The Company’s total loan growth in 2019 was broad-based across commercial, consumer, and commercial real estate loans.
2019 Financial Metrics Results: Growth in Total Deposits
The 2019 financial objectives included a 10% weighting based on achieving total deposit growth of 9.8%, equivalent to total deposits reaching $38.9 billion. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if loansdeposits grew to $26.56 billion,5.8%, with no credit givenachievement of the performance metric if loans weretotal deposit growth was less than that amount. ADeposit growth of at least 13.8% would translate to a maximum achievement of 200% would be achieved if loans grew to $28.62 billion or more in 2017. The goal was set to increase loans at a rate above analysts’ projections for our Peer Group.
Total loans were $29.05 billion as. As of December 31, 2017, represented2019, total deposits were $37.3 billion, representing a growth of 14%5.3% from 2016, compared2018 and did not meet the threshold established for this goal.
Our Bank recognizes the importance of having a solid deposit base to support our growth objectives while maintaining a 6%reasonable cost of deposits. While we did not meet our threshold this year, our deposit growth of 5.3% was slightly higher than the median loandeposit growth for our Peer Group, which was 5.0% in 2017. This resulted2019.
2019 Financial Metrics Results: Average Cost of Deposits
The 2019 financial objectives included a 10% weighting based on achieving a target average cost of deposits. The average cost of deposits was 0.71% in 2018 and, had increased considerably at the end of 2018. Accordingly, the Company’s annual financial budget assumed a year-over-year increase in the cost of deposits. The achievement target for the average cost of deposits was set at 1.04%, the forecasted amount in the Company’s annual financial budget for 2019. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if the average cost of deposit increased to 1.13%, with no achievement of the performance metric if the weighted cost of deposit exceeded that rate. An average cost of deposit of no more than 0.95% would translate to a maximum achievement of 200%. The full year 2019 average cost of deposit was 1.04%, resulting in a 200%100% achievement of this performance goal.
2019 Financial Metrics Results: Non-Performing Assets (“NPA”) to Total Assets
The 2019 financial objectives included a 15% weighting based on achieving an average quarterly NPA-to-total assets ratio of 0.29%. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if the NPA-to-total assets ratio was 0.50%, and no credit would be given if the ratio exceeded that amount. A ratio of no more than 0.25% would translate to a maximum achievement of 200%. Our average quarterly end-of-period NPA-to-total assets ratio was 0.30% in 2019, resulting in a 98% achievement of this performance goal. At 0.30%, our 2019 average NPA-to-total assets ratio was similar to the 2018 ratio of 0.29%.
2019 Financial Metrics Results: Net Charge-Off Ratio
The 2019 financial objectives included a 15% weighting based on achieving a full year net charge-off ratio of 0.15% in 2019. A threshold of 50% achievement would be achieved if the full year net charge-off ratio was 0.30%, and no credit would be given if the ratio exceeded that amount. A net charge-off ratio of below 0.10% would translate to a maximum achievement of 200%. For the full year 2019, our net charge-off ratio was 0.16%, resulting in a 97% achievement of this performance goal. The Company was pleased it was able2019 full year net charge-off ratio of 0.16% compared to achieve results consistent with expectations while maintaining pricing and credit quality discipline. The increase in loans was largely driven by balanced and diversified loan originations consistinga 2018 full year net-charge-off ratio of commercial, consumer as well as commercial real estate loans.0.13%.
39
Summary Results of Financial Metrics
The table below outlines the financial metrics and actual results for 2017.2019.
| Financial Metrics | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2017 Result | Metric Achievement | |||||||||||||||
| Earnings per Share (EPS) | 75% | $ | 3.09 | $ | 3.20 | $ | 3.32 | $ | 3.46 | * | 200 | % | |||||||||
| Total Loans (in Billions) | 25% | $ | 26.56 | $ | 27.59 | $ | 28.62 | $ | 29.05 | 200 | % | ||||||||||
| Total for Financial Metrics | 200 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Metrics | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2019 Result | Metric Achievement |
| Adjusted Earnings per Share (EPS) | 40% | $4.75 | $5.05 | $5.35 | $4.84* | 65% |
| Total Loan Growth | 10% | 5.70% | 9.70% | 13.70% | 7.40% | 71% |
| Total Deposit Growth | 10% | 5.80% | 9.80% | 13.80% | 5.30% | 0% |
| Average Cost of Deposits | 10% | 1.13% | 1.04% | 0.95% | 1.04% | 100% |
| Average Quarterly NPA-to-Total Assets | 15% | 0.50% | 0.29% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 98% |
| Full Year Net Charge-Off Ratio | 15% | 0.30% | 0.15% | 0.10% | 0.16% | 97% |
| Total for Financial Metrics | 73% |
*2017 adjusted Our reported earnings per share in 2019 were $4.61. 2019 Adjusted EPS was $3.46 comparedwere $4.84, excluding $0.23 per share loss from reversal of certain previously claimed tax credits and the impact of an impairment charge related to GAAP EPS of $3.47. 2017 adjusted EPS excludes $0.30 in gains on sales of bank premises and a business unitthe Company’s investments in the firstDC Solar tax credit funds. Please refer to the section titled “Item 7. MD&A — Supplemental Information-Explanation of GAAP and third quarters of 2017, respectively, and the new tax law and increaseNon-GAAP Financial Measures” in provisionour Annual Report on Form 10-K for income tax in the fourth quarter of 2017, resulting from the revaluation of deferred tax assets of $0.29.a full reconciliation.
40
20172019 Strategic Goals for Performance-Based Bonus
The 25% portion of the Performance-Based Bonus Plan attributable to Corporate Goals was based on the achievement of certain strategic initiatives, which are tied to building the Company’s platform and positioning it for sustained future growth.growth, comprise 30% of the Performance-Based Bonus Plan. The 20172019 strategic goals were focused on three areas with the following weightings:five equally weighted areas:
| · |
| · |
| · | Accelerate bridge banking by developing cross-border expertise that can more effectively serve the needs of our customers; |
| · | Evolve consumer banking strategy by building |
| · |
The Compensation Committee recognizes that strategic goals are not readily quantified in the same way as the financial metrics, and have more inherent subjectivity in their measurement. In light of these considerations, it has been the Compensation Committee’s practice to limit the achievement of strategic goals to no more than the percentage achieved for the financial goals, even if the Company achieved the maximum level of performance for any of the strategic goals.
20172019 Results of Strategic Goals Results
At its March 20182020 meeting, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO, made an assessment as to whether the Company’s strategic goals were achieved. The achievement of each goal relating to enhancing BSA/AML & OFAC programs and risk management was measured based on the Company’s effective completion of tasks related to its BSA/AML & OFAC programs, and the enhancementslevel of its risk management and enterprise risk management programs. The growth in bridge banking was measured based on internal goals set to improve our internal processes and programs to better support cross-border customers. The goal of talent and leadership development was measured by efforts on succession planning as well as key talent retention.
While strategic goals by their nature are longer term and the Company has made significant progress in each area, the CEO shared with the Compensation Committee that the strategic goals could have been advanced further in 2017.achievement established. After discussion with the CEO, the Compensation Committee determined that the overall achievement of strategic goals was at 89%. Specifically, whileHowever, the goalCompensation Committee limited the achievement of BSA/AML & OFAC and risk managementstrategic goals to no more than the percentage achieved for the financial goals. As a result, the final achievement of strategic goals used for Performance-Based Bonus calculation was achievedcapped at 100%73%, consistent with the goalsCompany’s achievement of building bridge banking and talent and leadership were each met in part, with achievement at 75% and 82.5%, respectively.financial goals.
Performance-Based Bonus for NEOs
In 2017,2019, using the above discussed performance goals, the Company achieved 172.3%73% of the target Corporate Goals, consisting of 200%73% achievement of the financial metrics (75%(70% weighting) and 89%73% achievement of strategic metrics (25%(30% weighting).
All NEOs except the CEO, and the President and Chief Operating Officer, were additionally evaluated based on individual and departmental goals as part of their 20172019 Performance-Based Bonus Plan. For the CFOChief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the Chief Risk Officer/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, 50% of their performance-based bonus was based on the achievement of the Corporate Goals as described above and 50% was based on individual and department goals. For the Head of International and Commercial Banking and Head of Consumer Banking and Digital Banking, 30% of histheir performance-based bonus was based on the achievement of the Corporate Goals and 70% was based on individual and department goals. Individual and departmental goals vary by individual and are set by the CEO, in conjunction with the Compensation Committee.
Long Term Incentive (“LTI”)LTI Awards
LTI awards are compensation awards designed to tie the compensation of our executivesexecutive officers to stockholder returns. These awards are generally granted in the first quarter of each year, allowing the Compensation Committee adequate time to evaluate prior year performance. When determining the annual LTI awards to our executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes it is important to take into account not only the grant date values included in the “Summary Compensation Table”, but also to consider the effect of the year-end value of our stock on those awards over time. The timing of the grants generally follows the filing of the Company’s annual reportreports on Form 10-K and occurs before the start of the Company’s “blackout period,” during which insiders may not engage in Company stock transactions. LTI awards are granted under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “2016 Stock Incentive Plan”), which is the Company’s omnibus stockholder-approved plan for equity awards to employees.
Similar to the 2016 LTI grant, 100%One hundred percentage of the value of the 2017 LTI awards granted to theour NEOs was comprised of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)is made through performance-based RSUs. Awards are subject to a performance period of three (3) years (January(for example, January 1, 20172019 through December 31, 2021 for awards granted in 2019), and isare payable at the end of the three-year period. AnEach year, an NEO may annually earn a “target” amount of RSUs equal to one third of the total RSUs granted. TheAs described below, however, the actual number of RSUs earned however, may be higher or lower than the target amount, and depending
41
amount. Depending on the Company’s financial performance that year relative to the Long Term Performance Peer Group, which is defined as the banks in the KRX, the actual number of RSUs earned in a year can range from 0% to 200% of the target RSUs as described below.RSUs. The Compensation Committee believes this practice further aligns our compensation program with industry best practices for LTI awards, and reflects an appropriate balance between financial reward and long-term performance.
The financial performance metrics we use for the LTI award – ROA, ROE and TSR – are common indicators of value creation and serve to focus management’s attention on enhancing results in these areas. ROE is a direct measurement of the return on capital. The Company believes that for long-term strategy and sustainability, ROA is an important and prudent metric, reflecting the Company’s ability to execute on its long term business model. TSR measures the movement of the Company’s stock price and dividends paid over time. The TSR metric underscores the connection between executive pay and stockholder interests by measuring our ability to provide a greater return to our stockholders than our competitors.
We set the “target” level of RSUs that could be earned in a given year at the median, or 50th percentile, of the ROA, ROE and TSR ratios of the Long Term Performance Peer Group. We believe these are challenging goals because of strong competition within the Long Term Performance Peer Group. The actual RSUs that are earned in a given year may be higher or lower than the target amount of RSUs if performance is better (or worse) relative to the Long Term Performance Peer Group. ROA, ROE and TSR ratios of less than the 50th percentile will proportionately reduce the amount of RSUs earned in that year, and no RSU isRSUs are earned if the ratios put the Company at less than the 30th percentile of the Long Term Performance Peer Group. A maximum of 200% award relative to the “target” level of RSUs will be earned for performance at or above the 80th percentile, and the award is prorated between 100% and 200% for performance between the 50th and 80th percentiles. The table below illustrates the relative weighting assigned to each financial metric and the performance required to achieve payouts.
| Metric | Weighting | Threshold (50% payout) | Target (100% payout) | Maximum (200% payout) | |||||
| ROA | 37.5% | 30th percentile | 50th percentile | >=80th percentile | |||||
| ROE | 37.5% | 30th percentile | 50th percentile | >=80th percentile | |||||
| TSR | 25% | 30th percentile | 50th percentile | >=80th percentile |
The Company calculates the aggregate grant date fair value of awards atas of the date of grant in accordance with the same standard it applies for financial accounting purposes. Consistent with SEC regulations, the grant date fair value of 20172019 LTI award equity grants for the NEOs are presented in the “Summary Compensation Table” and 2017 “Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.” table below. Total outstanding unexercised or unvested LTI grants are shown in the 2017 “Outstanding Equity Awards table.at Fiscal Year End” table below.
2019 Pay Mix for NEOs
The final 20172019 pay mix for our NEOs highlights the Company’s commitment to align compensation outcomes to results, and underscores our compensation philosophy of placing significant emphasis on at-risk, performance-based pay. In 2017,2019, over 80% of the CEO’s target pay was at risk and linked to performance-based outcomes. For the other NEOs, a range of 55%54% to 76%68% of target pay (on average, 64%63%) was at risk and tied to direct performance results.
Retirement Programs and Perquisites
Our NEOs receive the same customary benefits as all other employees, including medical, dental, life, disability, vacation cash-out, and a 401(k) planPlan (the “401(k) Plan”) which includes company matching contributions. The NEOs are eligible to participate in the same plans and to the same extent as most other salaried employees. Employees are allowed to cash out their earned vacation once a year if they met both vacation usage and time away from work requirements set by the Company. The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation Planplan (“Deferred Compensation Plan”) to help attract and retain executives and key employees. Two NEOs, Messrs. Guyett andOne NEO, Mr. Yen, participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2017.2019. Our Deferred Compensation Plan provides NEOs and other key employees the opportunity to defer a specified percentage of their annual base salary and/or their bonus under the annual cash bonus plan (in each case, up to 80%). The deferred amounts are credited to a participant’s account in which the participant isand are immediately vested. Participant accountsAmounts in a participant’ account are then hypothetically or “notionally” invested in one or more investment funds and adjusted forselected by such participant, with gains or losses adjusted based on the rate of return on the assets in each notional investment fund. We do not guarantee any returns on participant contributions. A variety of investment funds are available for selection. The available investment funds used to track such notional investment returns are substantially the same as those offered under our 401(k) Plan. Returns on participant contributions are not guaranteed. The Company has the discretion to make contributions to the Plan on behalf the participant. In 2017, the Company did not contribute to theDeferred Compensation Plan on behalf of its employees, including the NEOs.participants. In addition,2019, the Company maintains a legacy deferred compensation plan which hasdid not accepted newmake any such contributions since 2008. None ofto the NEOs participate in this plan.Deferred Compensation Plan.
In general, the NEOs do not have different or greater benefits than other employees with the exception of financial planning services and the use of a Company-owned car for the CEO, and automobile allowancesallowance for the President and COO and Head of International and Commercial Banking. The financial planning services are intended to help ensure compliance by the CEO with all applicable tax and regulatory requirements. For certain executives, the use of a company car and automobile allowance are permitted in recognition of their extensive business-related travel. The Compensation Committee reviews the perquisites provided to the NEOs annually as part of their overall review of executive compensation. Based on a review of competitive pay data provided by its external independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that the perquisites provided in 20172019 are within an appropriate range of competitive compensation practices.practices relative to our Peer Group. Details about the NEOs perquisites, including the cost to the Company, are shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the “All Other Compensation” column on page 4750 together with the accompanying footnotes.
43
20172019 Compensation Decisions for Named Executive Officers
With input from its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee considered the following contributions and achievements in determining the 20172019 compensation for the NEOs. Performance-based bonus awards were based on the financial performance of 20172019 and paid to the NEOs in March 2018.2020.
The Compensation Committee’s determination of each of these matters was based on the recommendation of the CEO (except in the case of his own compensation), the parameters established by the executive’sNEO’s employment agreement, if applicable, and the factors described below. In addition, in determining equity awards, the Compensation Committee considered its overall long-term incentive guidelines for all executives,executive officers, which attempt to balance in the context of the competitive market for executive talent, the benefits of incentive compensation tied to performance of the Company’s common stock with the dilutive effect of equity compensation awards.
| Dominic Ng | |
· ·
· Adjusting earnings for non-recurring items, 2019 non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted EPS were $707.9 million and $4.84, respectively, compared with $681.5 million and $4.66 for 2018, resulting in a year-over-year increase of 4%.2 · Revenue was $1.68 billion in 2019, compared with $1.60 billion in 2018, an increase of $79.8 million or 5%. · Efficiency ratio was 43.8% in 2019, an improvement of 93 basis points compared with 44.7% in 2018. · As of December 31, 2019, total loans, deposits and assets · Total loans increased $2.4 billion, or 7.4%, to · Total deposits increased $1.9 billion, or 5.3%, · Relative to banks in our Peer · ·
· Continued · Risk Management - Continued to further refine credit risk management programs, improving internal controls, and enhancing data governance. · People - In leadership team in defining, highlighting and reinforcing, across the Company, the behaviors and expectations that align with our corporate culture. | |
1 Forbes article dated January 22, 2020
2 See reconciliations of non-GAAP measures presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Item 7. MD&A - Supplemental Information - Explanation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
| Base Salary | · In March $1,275,000.1 |
| Performance-Based Bonus | · Mr. Ng received a performance-based bonus of |
LTI Award | · Mr. Ng received a target LTI award of |
1 Berry, Kate. “Consistent Performer: How Dominic Ng built East West Bank into a powerhouse” Americanbanker.com https://www.americanbanker.com/news/consistent-performer-how-dominic-ng-built-east-west-into-a-powerhouse
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Irene H. Oh | |
· The Company’s
· · Continued to make productivity and process improvements in the finance and accounting · Led various fee income business units, resulting in an increased noninterest income in the · Led the Company’s operational units and the development and ongoing implementation of the · Highlighted the importance of the corporate culture, and communicated to associates about the Company’s values and culture. | |
| Base Salary | · Ms. Oh’s increased to $620,000 from $550,000 in 2019. The salary increase was based on the financial success of the Company in 2018, the expansion of Ms. Oh’s responsibilities and her overall performance in 2019. |
| Performance-Based Bonus | · Ms. Oh received a performance-based bonus of |
· Ms. Oh received | |
| 1 | Mr. Ng’s 2019 base salary was inadvertently reported as $1,270,000, instead of $1,275,000, in our 2019 proxy statement. |
Catherine Zhou | |
| 2019 Key Achievements | · Launched a digital banking platform in 2019 that resulted in new customers. Substantially simplified and streamlined the customer onboarding experience through use of technology in multiple areas. · Led the retail banking teams in coordinating business responses and activities, resulting in an increase in deposits and loans. · Led the growth in mortgage business, resulting in total year-over-year growth in single-family residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. · Reinforced the importance of the corporate culture, and effectively communicated to all associates across retail banking, wealth management, private banking, digital banking, and mortgage teams about the Company’s values and culture. |
| Base Salary | · Ms. Zhou’s 2019 base salary was increased to $669,500 from $650,000 in 2018. The increase to Ms. Zhou’s salary was based on her overall performance and contributions in 2018. |
| Performance-Based Bonus | · Ms. Zhou received a performance-based bonus of $600,073 for 2019. Ms. Zhou’s performance-based bonus award was 89.63% of her 2019 target bonus, what was set at 100% of base salary. 30% of the possible bonus amount was determined based on the Company’s achievement of the Corporate Goals under the formula-based Performance-Based Bonus Plan, and the balance was based on the achievement of individual and department goals. |
| LTI Award | · Ms. Zhou received a target LTI award of $500,000 in RSUs. The award is subject to the performance of the Company on ROA, ROE and TSR relative to the Long Term Performance Peer Group. All LTI equity grants are subject to a three-year cliff performance schedule
|
Douglas P. Krause | |
· · · · Effectively supported the diversity initiatives. | |
| Base Salary | · Mr. Krause’s $500,000, an increase from $480,000 in 2019. The increase to Mr. Krause’s salary was based on his overall performance and contributions in 2019. |
| Performance-Based Bonus | · Mr. Krause received a performance-based bonus of
|
· Mr. Krause received a target LTI award of | |
| Andy Yen | |
· · ·
increasing customer wallet share by through fee income product growth. | |
| Base Salary | · Mr. Yen’s $435,000, an increase from $413,100 in 2018. The increase to Mr. Yen’s salary was based on his overall performance and contributions in 2018. |
| Performance-Based Bonus | · Mr. Yen received a performance-based bonus of |
· Mr. Yen received | |
2018 Executive Compensation Program Decisions
The Compensation Committee met in March 2018 to discuss parameters of the 2018 executive compensation program. Consistent with the long term focus and risk management practices of the Company, the Compensation Committee approved a compensation program that continues to reinforce our pay for performance philosophy. These compensation decisions, which will be described in more detail in next year’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis, are summarized as follows:
The following salary decisions were made: Ms. Oh’s salary was adjusted to $550,000, Mr. Krause’s salary was adjusted to $480,000, and Mr. Yen’s salary was adjusted to $413,100, while the salaries of Messrs. Ng and Guyett remained unchanged.
For the 2018 Performance-Based Bonus Plan, the Company’s Corporate Goals will consist of financial metrics as well as strategic goals. Financial metrics will again comprise 75%, while the balance will be based on the attainment of the Company’s strategic goals. The 2018 financial metrics include diluted EPS with a 50% weighting, loan growth with a 15% weighting, deposit growth with a 15% weighting and, average quarterly non-performing assets to total assets with a 20% weighting.
The weighting of strategic objectives of 25% of the Corporate Goals, remained unchanged from 2017. These strategic goals are important measurement tools for the Company to continue to focus on its risk management practices and core business strategies. The goals will be focused in five strategic areas including risk management, bridge banking, core capabilities, expansion of services and talent management. Each of the corporate goals is assigned an equal weighting.
Under the 2018 Performance-Based Bonus Plan, the Committee approved target incentives equal to 80% of salary for Ms. Oh and Mr. Krause and target incentives consistent with 2017 for the other NEOs.
The LTI awards granted in 2018 are subject to the satisfaction of the Company’s annual performance metrics for each year of the three-year period (January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020), and are payable only at the end of the three-year period. At 100%, or “target,” achievement, the NEOs would earn the following equivalent amount in RSUs: Mr. Ng - $4,500,000; Mr. Guyett - $2,200,000; Ms. Oh - $700,000; Mr. Krause - $500,000; and Mr. Yen - $230,000. The specific performance metrics and performance standards are as follows:
47
Other Compensation Policies and Information
In addition to adhering to the processes described in the preceding sections, the Compensation Committee maintains a strong corporate governance culture with respect to executive compensation. Over the years it has adopted policies, including those described below, to further align executive compensation with performance and what the Company believes is the best interest of the stockholders.
Clawbacks for Any Restatement; Executive Compensation Recovery Policy
The Company has adopted an Executive Compensation Recovery Policy for our NEOs, which was approved by the Compensation Committee in 2012. Under this policy, all annual performance-based bonus payments and annual LTI awards that are based upon the Company’s financial performance may be subject to clawback in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements. The clawback will be required without regard to the reason for the restatement, and the affected officers will be required to repay the Company the amount of any incentive payment or incentive award received in excess of what would have been paid based on the restated numbers.
Trading Restrictions; No Hedging or Pledging of Common Stock
As provided in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, it is against Company policy for any employee, including any executive officer, to engage in speculative transactions in Company securities, which include but are not limited to trades in puts or calls in Company securities or selling Company securities short. In addition, under our Governance Guidelines,Insider Trading Policy, it is against Company policy for NEOs to pledge their shares of common stock in the Company for any purpose.
No Tax Gross Ups
We do not provide for any tax gross ups of excise or other taxes on severance payments or in connection with a change in control.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended by the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, generally limits the tax deductibility of compensation paid by a public company to its CEO, CFO and certain other highly compensated executive officers to $1 million in the year the compensation becomes taxable to the executive. Prior to the amendment, there was an exception to the limit on deductibility for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the performance-based exception has been repealed with respect to federal income taxes. The new rules generally apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, but do not apply to compensation provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 that is not modified in any material respect after that date. Although the Company does consider the impact of this rule when making compensation decisions, Company policy does not require all executive compensation to be tax-deductible. In the interest of flexibility and overall benefit for the Company’s stockholders, the Compensation Committee will continue to facilitate the awarding of responsible but adequate executive compensation. The Company believes that all performance-based compensation paid in 2017 and that will be paid in future years pursuant to compensation decisions made in 2017 should be deductible under Section 162(m). Following the legislative changes after November 2, 2017 and based on uncertainties with regard to the application of Section 162(m), as amended, there can be no assurance that amounts paid over $1 million will be deductible under Section 162(m).
Compensation Program Risk Analysis
The Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s compensation policies and practices for our NEOs and other employees. The Compensation Committee has determined that our incentive compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. To conduct this review, the Company annually completes an inventory of its incentive compensation plans and policies. This evaluation covers a wide range of practices and policies including: the balanced mix between pay elements, short term and long term programs, caps on incentive payouts, governance controls in place to establish, review and approve goals, use of multiple performance measures, Compensation Committee discretion on individual awards, use of stock ownership guidelines,Stock Ownership Guidelines, use and provisions in severance/change of control policies, use of the Executive Compensation Recovery Policy and Compensation Committee oversight of compensation programs.
The Compensation Committee also evaluated, along with the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, the conformity of the criteria and targets of our compensation program with the risk profile of the Company and whether the proposed goals or the structure of the awards might have the inadvertent effect of encouraging excessive risk or other undesirable behavior.
48
Report by Compensation Committee
The following Compensation Committee Report is not deemed filedto be “soliciting material,” or to be “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoin any other document, includingfiling of the Company’s filingsCompany under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of 1934,any general incorporation language in any such filing, except tothe extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report into any such filing by reference.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon this review and our discussions, the East West Bancorp, Inc. Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this 2018 Proxy Statement and be includedincorporated by reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Jack C. Liu, Chairman
Molly Campbell
Herman Y. Li
The NEOs only receive compensation for services as executive officers and employees of the Bank, and no separate compensation is paid for their services to the Company. The table below and the accompanying footnotes summarize the 2017, 20162019, 2018, and 20152017 compensation for the NEOs (other than Mr. Guyett for whom only 2017 and 2016 compensation is shown as Mr. Guyett commenced employment with the Company in 2016):NEOs:
| Change in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pension Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonqualified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-Equity | Deferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock | Option | Incentive Plan | Compensation | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name and Principal | Salary | Bonus | Awards | Awards | Compensation | Earnings | Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Position | Year | ($) | ($) | ($)(1) | ($) | ($)(2) | ($)(3) | ($)(4) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 2017 | 1,165,385 | - | 4,146,023 | - | 2,067,600 | - | 55,076 | 7,434,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chairman and Chief | 2016 | 1,000,000 | - | 3,740,175 | - | 3,820,000 | (5) | - | 111,490 | 8,671,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officer | 2015 | 1,000,000 | - | 4,119,935 | - | 3,810,000 | (6) | - | 110,586 | 9,040,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | 2017 | 750,000 | - | 2,280,338 | - | 1,292,250 | - | 30,361 | 4,352,949 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President and Chief | 2016 | 186,782 | (7) | - | 1,000,000 | - | 247,500 | (7) | - | 38,454 | 1,472,736 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Irene H. O h | 2017 | 454,808 | - | 362,815 | - | 429,962 | - | 12,150 | 1,259,735 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President | 2016 | 425,700 | - | 327,282 | - | 401,865 | - | 13,562 | 1,168,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and Chief Financial Officer | 2015 | 403,090 | - | 257,501 | - | 366,257 | - | 13,475 | 1,040,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 2017 | 412,212 | - | 362,815 | - | 407,946 | - | 10,255 | 1,193,228 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, | 2016 | 375,000 | - | 327,282 | - | 370,088 | 295,568 | 26,120 | 1,394,058 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Risk Officer, | 2015 | 375,000 | - | 231,784 | - | 214,875 | 292,863 | 25,461 | 1,139,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General Counsel and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Secretary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 2017 | 404,135 | - | 295,413 | - | 199,868 | - | 38,794 | 938,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President | 2016 | 395,594 | - | 257,156 | - | 192,000 | - | 45,389 | 890,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and Head of International | 2015 | 370,977 | - | 274,976 | - | 196,828 | - | 46,433 | 889,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and Commercial Banking | �� | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(3) | All O ther Compensation($)(4) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 2019 | 1,262,308 | - | 5,100,074 | - | 930,750 | - | 120,109 | 7,413,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chairman and Chief | 2018 | 1,200,000 | - | 4,670,788 | - | 1,621,200 | - | 95,696 | 7,587,684 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officer | 2017 | 1,165,385 | - | 4,146,023 | - | 2,067,600 | - | 55,076 | 7,434,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 2019 | 608,154 | - | 822,634 | - | 400,644 | - | 14,985 | 1,846,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, | 2018 | 534,423 | 200,000 | 728,291 | - | 495,220 | - | 41,029 | 1,998,963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer | 2017 | 454,808 | - | 362,815 | - | 429,962 | - | 12,150 | 1,259,735 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Catherine Zhou | 2019 | 666,200 | - | 502,067 | - | 600,073 | - | 64,550 | 1,832,890 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, | 2018 | 650,000 | - | 554,554 | - | 675,480 | - | 5,875 | 1,885,909 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Head of Consumer Banking and Digital Banking | 2017 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 2019 | 496,615 | - | 617,481 | - | 324,400 | - | 32,984 | 1,471,481 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, | 2018 | 469,615 | - | 520,791 | - | 434,419 | - | 29,856 | 1,454,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2017 | 412,212 | - | 362,815 | - | 407,946 | - | 10,255 | 1,193,228 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 2019 | 431,294 | - | 309,751 | - | 176,132 | �� | - | 32,273 | 949,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President, | 2018 | 411,698 | - | 240,641 | - | 219,335 | - | 39,357 | 911,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Head of International and Commercial Banking | 2017 | 404,135 | - | 295,413 | - | 199,868 | - | 38,794 | 938,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair values of the RSUs and performance-based RSUs granted in |
| (2) | Represents incentive compensation |
| (3) | Includes the year-to-date change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the |
| (4) |
The table below summarizes theall plan-based awards granted by the Compensation Committee to the NEOs in 2017:2019:
2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity | Grant Date Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grant | Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Incentive Plan Awards (2) | Value of Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | Award ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 3/2/2017 | 600,000 | 1,200,000 | 2,400,000 | 36,631 | 73,261 | 146,522 | 4,146,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | 3/2/2017 | 375,000 | 750,000 | 1,500,000 | 20,147 | 40,294 | 80,588 | 2,280,338 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 3/2/2017 | 161,000 | 322,000 | 644,000 | 3,206 | 6,411 | 12,822 | 362,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 3/2/2017 | 147,000 | 294,000 | 588,000 | 3,206 | 6,411 | 12,822 | 362,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 3/2/2017 | 101,250 | 202,500 | 405,000 | 2,610 | 5,220 | 10,440 | 295,413 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Award ($) Units(3) (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 2/4/2019 | 39 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 637,500 | 1,275,000 | 2,550,000 | 46,650 | 93,299 | 186,598 | - | 5,098,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 2/4/2019 | 39 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 248,000 | 496,000 | 992,000 | 7,509 | 15,018 | 30,036 | - | 820,612 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Catherine Zhou | 2/4/2019 | 39 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 334,750 | 669,500 | 1,339,000 | 4,694 | 9,387 | 18,774 | 9,387 | 500,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 2/4/2019 | 39 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 200,000 | 400,000 | 800,000 | 5,632 | 11,264 | 22,528 | - | 615,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 2/4/2019 | 39 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 108,750 | 217,500 | 435,000 | 2,816 | 5,632 | 11,264 | 307,729 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | These grants show the potential payment for our NEOs under our formula-based Performance-Based Bonus Plan. Additional information regarding the Performance-Based Bonus Plan is discussed in the section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - |
| (2) | Represents performance-based RSUs that cliff vest on March |
| (3) | Represent RSUs granted on February 4, 2019 as part of the all employee Spirit of Ownership Program. All RSUs cliff vest three years from the date of grant. |
| (4) | The assumptions applied in determining the grant date fair value are the same as those set forth in footnote 1 to the “Summary Compensation |
51
The table below sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of December 31, 2017.2019. There were no outstanding option awards.awards held by NEOs as of December 31, 2019. With the exception of Mr. Guyett’s outstanding restricted stock unit awardsthe broad-based employee RSUs granted in 2016on February 16, 2018 and Mr. Yen’s outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted in 2015,February 4, 2019, all of the outstanding equity awards are performance-based awards with payouts that depend on the outcome of the performance criteria and the price of the Company’s common stock on the award certification date. The performance-based awards have a term of three years, and will vest based on the achievement of the applicable performance criteria.
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017Fiscal Year-End
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Incentive | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Incentive | Plan Awards: | |||||||||||||||||
| Plan Awards: | Market or | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Payout Value of | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Market Value | Unearned | Unearned | |||||||||||||||
| Shares or Units | of Shares or | Shares, Units or | Shares or Units | |||||||||||||||
| of Stock That | Units of Stocks | Other Rights | of Stocks That | |||||||||||||||
| Have Not | That Have Not | That Have Not | Have Not | |||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Vested (#)(1) | Vested ($)(2) | Vested (#) | Vested ($)(2) | |||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 2/27/2015 | 180,784 | (3) | 10,997,091 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/1/2016 | 149,526 | (4) | 9,095,667 | 85,444 | (4) (5) | 5,197,559 | ||||||||||||
| 3/2/2017 | 48,841 | (6) | 2,970,998 | 97,681 | (5) (6) | 5,941,935 | ||||||||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | 10/3/2016 | - | - | 27,390 | (7) | 1,666,134 | ||||||||||||
| 3/2/2017 | 26,863 | (6) | 1,634,076 | 53,725 | (5) (6) | 3,268,092 | ||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 2/27/2015 | 11,300 | (3) | 687,379 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/1/2016 | 13,085 | (4) | 795,961 | 7,477 | (4) (5) | 454,826 | ||||||||||||
| 3/2/2017 | 4,274 | (6) | 259,987 | 8,548 | (5) (6) | 519,975 | ||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 2/27/2015 | 10,171 | (3) | 618,702 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/1/2016 | 13,085 | (4) | 795,961 | 7,477 | (4) (5) | 454,826 | ||||||||||||
| 3/2/2017 | 4,274 | (6) | 259,987 | 8,548 | (5) (6) | 519,975 | ||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 2/27/2015 | - | - | 6,883 | (8) | 418,693 | ||||||||||||
| 3/1/2016 | 10,281 | (4) | 625,393 | 5,875 | (4) (5) | 357,376 | ||||||||||||
| 3/2/2017 | 3,480 | (6) | 211,688 | 6,960 | (5) (6) | 423,377 | ||||||||||||
| Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Not Vested ($)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | ||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | 3/2/2017 | 122,102 | (3) | 5,946,367 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 2/16/2018 | 30 | (4) | 1,461 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/8/2018 | 66,578 | (6) | 3,242,349 | 44,386 | (5) (6) | 2,161,598 | |||||||||||
| 2/4/2019 | 39 | (4) | 1,899 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 46,650 | (7) | 2,271,855 | 124,399 | (5) (7) | 6,058,231 | |||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 3/2/2017 | 10,685 | (3) | 520,360 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 2/16/2018 | 30 | (4) | 1,461 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/8/2018 | 10,357 | (6) | 504,386 | 6,905 | (5) (6) | 336,274 | |||||||||||
| 2/4/2019 | 39 | (4) | 1,899 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 7,509 | (7) | 365,688 | 20,024 | (5) (7) | 975,169 | |||||||||||
| Catherine Zhou | 10/2/2017 | 33,135 | (4) | 1,613,675 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 2/16/2018 | 30 | (4) | 1,461 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/8/2018 | 8,175 | (6) | 398,123 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 2/4/2019 | 39 | (4) | 1,899 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 4,694 | (7) | 228,598 | 12,516 | (5) (7) | 609,529 | |||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 3/2/2017 | 10,685 | (3) | 520,360 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 2/16/2018 | 30 | (4) | 1,461 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/8/2018 | 7,398 | (6) | 360,283 | 4,932 | (5) (6) | 240,188 | |||||||||||
| 2/4/2019 | 39 | (4) | 1,899 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 5,632 | (7) | 274,278 | 15,019 | (5) (7) | 731,425 | |||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 3/2/2017 | 8,700 | (3) | 423,690 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 2/16/2018 | 30 | (4) | 1,461 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/8/2018 | 3,403 | (6) | 165,726 | 2,269 | (5) (6) | 110,500 | |||||||||||
| 2/4/2019 | 39 | (4) | 1,899 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 3/6/2019 | 2,816 | (7) | 137,139 | 7,510 | (5) (7) | 365,737 | |||||||||||
| (1) | Represents grants of performance-based RSUs. The vesting of the performance-based RSUs is subject to meeting the three-year service condition from the grant date and pre-established performance goals in each of the three years ending December 31 of the respective fiscal year. Dividends are accrued on the performance RSUs and paid at the time of vesting. |
| (2) | The amounts shown represent the number of shares or units shown in the column immediately to the left multiplied by the closing price on December |
| (3) | This performance-based RSU granted on |
| (4) |
| (5) | Reflects the maximum potential payout, but the actual number of shares ultimately paid out may vary from the amount shown on the table, with the possibility of payout, ranging from no payout to maximum payout depending on the outcome of the performance criteria. |
| (6) | This performance-based RSU granted on March |
| (7) |
The following table summarizes, for the NEOs, the option exercises and stock awards vested during 2017.2019. The amounts reflected below show the number of shares acquired at the time of exercise or vesting, as applicable. The amounts reported as value realized are shown on a before-tax basis:
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in the 2017 Fiscal Year
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||
| Shares Acquired | Value Realized | Shares Acquired | Value Realized | |||||||||||||
| Name | on Exercise (#) | on Exercise ($) | on Vesting (#) | on Vesting ($)(1) | ||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | - | - | 176,390 | 9,678,519 | ||||||||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | - | - | 10,854 | 595,559 | ||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | - | - | 10,854 | 595,559 | ||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | - | - | 6,784 | 372,238 | ||||||||||||
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1) | ||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | - | - | 213,609 | 11,378,951 | ||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | - | - | 18,692 | 995,723 | ||||||||||||
| Catherine Zhou | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | - | - | 18,692 | 995,723 | ||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | - | - | 14,687 | 782,376 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | The amount represents the number of shares vested multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the |
The following table summarizes information about NEO participation in our nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which is described on page 4043 above, in the “Retirement Programs and Perquisites” section. In 2017,2019, there were no contributions made by the Company to the Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of any NEOs. Messrs. Guyett andMr. Yen werewas the only NEOsNEO who participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan during 2017.2019.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
| Name | Executive Contributions in 2019 ($)(1) | Registrant Contributions in 2019 ($) | Aggregate Earnings in 2019 ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2019 ($) | |||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Catherine Zhou | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 217,365 | - | 20,956 | - | 753,959 | |||||||||||||||
| Executive | Registrant | Aggregate | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||||
| Contributions in | Contributions in | Earnings in 2017 | Withdrawals / | Aggregate Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
| Name | 2017 ($)(1) | 2017 ($) | ($)(2) | Distributions ($) | December 31, 2017 ($) | |||||||||||||||
| Dominic Ng | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | 576,923 | - | 10,039 | - | 586,962 | |||||||||||||||
| Irene H. Oh | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
| Andy Yen | 194,327 | - | 3,185 | - | 197,512 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | The amounts included in this column are included in the Summary Compensation Table for |
| (2) | Reflects hypothetical or “notional” gains on account balances based on the NEO’s selected investments. |
53
We have two retirement plans. Our 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is a qualified retirement plan under the Code and is open to all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries with at least three months of service.
We also have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) which was established in 2001 in order to provide supplemental retirement benefits to certain employees whose contributions to the 401(k) Plan are limited under applicable Internal Revenue Service regulations. The SERP was also intended as a retention incentive to ensure the continued employment of the officers participating in the plan. As of December 31, 2017,2019, none of our NEOs were participants in the SERP.
As part of the life insurance contracts purchased when the SERP was established, beneficiaries of the SERP participants would be entitled to a death benefit. Although Mr. Ng and Mr. Krause are not currently participants in the SERP, each was at the time it was established in 2001 and death benefits for their beneficiaries remain in effect. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mr. Ng’s beneficiaries would be entitled to death benefits of $21,580,000 and Mr. Krause’s beneficiaries would be entitled to death benefits of $7,740,000 under the SERP.
Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The Bank, the Company’s principal subsidiary, has entered into employment agreements with the NEOs. This is intended to ensure that the Bank will be able to maintain a stable and competent management base.
Chief Executive Officer
The Bank entered into an employment agreement with its CEO, Mr. Ng, in June 1998 in connection with the sale of the Bank by its prior stockholders (the “Ng Employment Agreement)Agreement”). The Ng Employment Agreement was reapproved by the Board and amended on March 8, 20184, 2020 to provide for a termination date of March 8, 2021.4, 2023. In addition to a base salary and bonus to be determined annually, the employment agreement provides for, among other things, use of a Company car, participation in stock benefit plans and other fringe benefits applicable to executive personnel and four weeks paid vacation per year.
In the event the Bank chooses to terminate Mr. Ng’s employment for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the Ng Employment Agreement), or in the event of Mr. Ng’s resignation from the Bank upon (i) failure to re-elect him to his current offices; (ii) a material change in functions, duties or responsibilities; (iii) a relocation of his principal place of employment by more than 25 miles; (iv) liquidation or dissolution of the Bank; (v) a breach of the employment agreement by the Bank; or (vi) his death or permanent disability, Mr. Ng, or, in the event of death, his beneficiary, would be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (i) the remaining payments due to him and the contributions that would have been made on his behalf to any employee benefit plans of the Bank during the remaining term of the employment agreement andor (ii) three times the base salary currently in effect plus three times the preceding year’s bonus.bonus payable in a lump sum.
Under the assumption that Mr. Ng’s employment with the Company was terminated on December 31, 20172019 for any reason other than Cause, he would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $7,600,641.$6,698,480. Also, if Mr. Ng’s employment with the Company was terminated for any reason other than Cause, his outstanding and unvested stock options, time-based and performance-based RSUs would become fully vested. If Mr. Ng’s employment with the Company was terminated for any reason other than Cause on December 31, 2017,2019, the market value of his RSUs which would accelerate in vesting is $34,203,249.
President and Chief Operating Officer
On October 5, 2016, the Company announced the appointment of Mr. Guyett as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank, starting October 5, 2016. In connection with his appointment, Mr. Guyett and the Bank entered into an employment agreement, effective October 3, 2016 (the “Guyett Employment Agreement”). The Guyett Employment Agreement has an initial term of two years and is subject to annual renewal thereafter as may be agreed by the Bank’s Board of Directors and Mr. Guyett. The Guyett Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Guyett will receive an annual base salary of $750,000, and will be eligible to participate in an annual performance-based cash incentive plan, with a target bonus opportunity of 100% of the annual base salary. Mr. Guyett will also be eligible to receive annual stock grants as approved by the Board of Directors.
Also, pursuant to the Guyett Employment Agreement, on October 3, 2016, Mr. Guyett received a grant of $1,000,000 of RSUs upon his hire, granted pursuant to the Equity Plan, with a three-year cliff vesting period (the “Sign-On RSU Grant”). In addition, Mr. Guyett is also entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans and perquisite arrangements available to senior executives, relocation assistance and allowances, business expense reimbursements, and an annual car allowance of $12,000 for business-related purposes.
The Guyett Employment Agreement also provided that Mr. Guyett would receive, in March 2017, a grant of $2,200,000 of performance RSUs awarded pursuant to the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), with a three-year cliff vesting period (the “Initial Performance RSU Grant”).
The Bank may terminate Mr. Guyett’s employment at any time for any reason or no reason at all, upon one month advance written notice. In the event of a termination of Mr. Guyett’s employment (i) by the Bank without Cause (as defined in the Guyett Employment Agreement and contingent upon Mr. Guyett’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claim), (ii) by Mr. Guyett for Just Reason (as defined in the Guyett Employment Agreement) or (iii) if, without Mr. Guyett’s consent, (A) the Guyett Employment Agreement is not, whether initially or with respect to any subsequent renewal period, renewed or approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (other than in connection with a for Cause event), and (B) within one month following the end of the then-current employment term, Mr. Guyett resigns from the Bank, Mr. Guyett shall be entitled to receive (1) a single lump sum severance amount as follows (a) an amount equal to two times Mr. Guyett’s then Annual Base Salary and (b) an amount equal to the annual cash bonus payout last received by Mr. Guyett and (2) any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or preceding the date of termination. Under the assumption that Mr. Guyett’s employment with the Company was terminated on December 31, 2017 for any reason other than Cause, he would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $1,747,500.
In addition, the Initial Performance RSU grant, the Sign-On RSU Grant and any 2018 equity award shall continue to vest according to the grant date schedules, provided that, such performance RSUs will be settled based on performance unit goal achievement, except that if Mr. Guyett’s employment with the Company is terminated within two years after a Change of Control (as defined in the Guyett Employment Agreement), such performance RSUs will be settled as follows: (i) any performance RSUs for which the performance period has elapsed will continue to vest based on performance unit goal achievement, and (ii) any performance RSUs for which the performance period has not lapsed will be converted into time-based units$15,573,846 based on the target performance level. The outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Guyett at December 31, 2017 are disclosed inclosing price of the table on page 49Company’s common stock as of this Proxy Statement.that date.
In the event of a termination of Mr. Guyett’s employment as the result of his death or due to Disability (as defined in the Guyett Employment Agreement), Mr. Guyett or his beneficiary will be entitled to receive any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or proceeding the date of termination.
The Guyett Employment Agreement also provides that if Mr. Guyett’s employment terminates as a result of death or Disability, all unvested performance RSUs that have been granted prior to the date of death or Disability shall immediately vest. The market value of his performance RSUs which would have accelerated in vesting as a result of death or due to Disability on December 31, 2017 would have been $6,568,302.
Chief Financial Officer
On December 21, 2016, the Bank entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with its Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Oh (the “Oh Employment Agreement”). The Oh Employment Agreement, effective as of December 21, 2016, has an initial term of two years and is subject to annual renewal thereafter as may be agreed by the Bank’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and Ms. Oh. The Oh Employment Agreement was reapproved by the Board and amended on December 21, 2019 to provide for a termination date of December 21, 2020.
The Oh Employment Agreement provides that Ms. Oh will receive an Annual Base Salary of $430,000,annual base salary, subject to periodic review and increase, and will be eligible to participate in an annual performance-based cash incentive plan, with a target bonus opportunity of 60% of the annual base salary.plan. However, any actual bonus for any given year will be determined and paid in accordance with the Bank’s annual bonus plan arrangements applicable to senior executives generally. Ms. Oh will also be eligible to receive annual stock grants as approved by the Boardboard of Directors.directors. In addition, Ms. Oh will be entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans and perquisite arrangements available to senior executives of the Bank and shall receive reimbursement of reasonable business expenses. Ms. Oh’s employment with the Bank may be terminated by the Bank with or
54
without Cause (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement), in the event of disabilityDisability (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement) or death.
The Bank may terminate Ms. Oh’s employment with the Bank at any time without Cause, for any reason or no reason at all, upon one month advance written notice. In addition, it shall be considered termination without Cause by the Bank if (1) Ms. Oh terminates her employment for Just Reason (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement) or if (2) without Ms. Oh’s consent, (a) the Oh Employment Agreement is not, whether initially or with respect to any subsequent renewal period, renewed or approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (other than in connection with a for Cause event), and (b) within one month following the end of the then-current employment term, Ms. Oh resigns from the Bank.
In the event of a termination of Ms. Oh’s employment by the Bank without Cause, and contingent upon Ms. Oh’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims, the Bank shall pay to Ms. Oh the following: (1) a single lump sum amount (Severance Pay as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement) consisting of an amount equal to two times of Ms. Oh’s then annual base salary and an amount equal to the annual cash bonus payout last received by Ms. Oh; and (2) any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or preceding the date of termination. Under the assumption that Ms. Oh’s employment with the Company
was terminated on December 31, 20172019 for any reason other than Cause, she would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $1,321,865.$1,640,644.
In addition, any equity awards would continue to vest according to the grant date schedules, provided that, performance RSUs will be settled based on performance unit goal achievement, except that if such termination of employment occurs within two (2) years after a Change of Control (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement), any performance RSUs will be settled as follows: (1) any RSUs for which the performance period has elapsed will continue to vest based on performance unit goal achievement, and (2) any RSUs for which the performance period has not lapsed will be converted into time-based units based on the target performance level. The outstanding equity awards held by Ms. Oh as of December 31, 20172019 are disclosed in the table on page 49 of this Proxy Statement.52 under“Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End”.
In the event of a termination of Ms. Oh’s employment as the result of her death or due to Disability, (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement), Ms. Oh or her beneficiary will be entitled to receive (1) the Accrued Obligations (as defined in the Oh Employment Agreement) and (2) any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or preceding the date of termination. The Oh Employment Agreement also provides that if Ms. Oh’s employment terminates as a result of death or Disability, all unvested performance RSUs that have been granted prior to the date of death or Disability shall immediately vest. The market value of her performance RSUs which would have accelerated in vesting as a result of her death or Disability on December 31, 20172019 would have been $2,718,128.$2,049,515.
Chief Risk Officer, Head of Consumer Banking and Digital Banking
On September 1, 2017, the Bank entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with its Head of Consumer Banking and Digital Banking, Ms. Zhou (the “Zhou Employment Agreement”). The Zhou Employment Agreement, effective as of October 2, 2017, has an initial term of two years and is subject to annual renewal thereafter as may be agreed by the Bank’s Board of Directors and Ms. Zhou. The Zhou Employment Agreement was reapproved by the Board and amended on October 2, 2019 to provide for a termination date of October 2, 2020.
The Zhou Employment Agreement provides that Ms. Zhou will receive an annual base salary, subject to periodic review and increase, and will be eligible to participate in an annual performance-based cash incentive plan. However, any actual bonus for any given year will be determined and paid in accordance with the Bank’s annual bonus plan arrangements applicable to senior executives generally. Ms. Zhou will also be eligible to receive annual stock grants as approved by the Board of Directors. In addition, Ms. Zhou will be entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans and perquisite arrangements available to senior executives of the Bank and shall receive reimbursement of reasonable business expenses. Ms. Zhou’s employment with the Bank may be terminated by the Bank with or without Cause (as defined in the Zhou Employment Agreement), in the event of Disability (as defined in the Zhou Employment Agreement) or death.
The Bank may terminate Ms. Zhou’s employment with the Bank at any time without Cause, for any reason or no reason at all, upon one month advance written notice. In addition, it shall be considered termination without Cause by the Bank if (1) Ms. Zhou terminates her employment for Just Reason (as defined in the Zhou Employment Agreement) or if (2) without Ms. Zhou’s consent, (a) the Zhou Employment Agreement is not, whether initially or with respect to any subsequent renewal period, renewed or approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (other than in connection with a for Cause event), and (b) within one month following the end of the then-current employment term, Ms. Zhou resigns from the Bank.
In the event of a termination of Ms. Zhou’s employment by the Bank without Cause, and contingent upon Ms. Zhou’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims, the Bank shall pay to Ms. Zhou the following: (1) a single lump sum amount consisting of an amount equal to two times of Ms. Zhou’s then annual base salary; and (2) any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or preceding the date of termination. Under the assumption that Ms. Zhou’s employment with the Company
55
was terminated on December 31, 2019 for any reason other than Cause, she would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $1,339,000.
In addition, any equity awards would continue to vest according to the grant date schedules, provided that, performance RSUs will be settled based on performance unit goal achievement, except that if such termination of employment occurs within two (2) years after a Change of Control (as defined in the Zhou Employment Agreement), any performance RSUs will be settled as follows: (1) any RSUs for which the performance period has elapsed will continue to vest based on performance unit goal achievement, and (2) any RSUs for which the performance period has not lapsed will be converted into time-based units based on the target performance level. The outstanding equity awards held by Ms. Zhou as of December 31, 2019 are disclosed in the table on page 52 of this Proxy Statement.
In the event of a termination of Ms. Zhou’s employment as the result of her death or due to Disability (as defined in the Zhou Employment Agreement), Ms. Zhou or her beneficiary will be entitled to receive (1) the Accrued Obligations and (2) any annual bonus earned but unpaid with respect to a performance year ending on or preceding the date of termination. The Zhou Employment Agreement also provides that if Ms. Zhou’s employment terminates as a result of death or Disability, all unvested RSUs, that have been granted prior to the date of death or Disability shall immediately vest. The market value of her RSUs which would have accelerated in vesting as a result of her death or Disability on December 31, 2019 would have been $2,548,520.
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
The Bank entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Risk Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Mr. Krause, in 1999 (the “Krause Employment Agreement”). The Krause Employment Agreement was reapproved by the Board of Directors and amended on March 8, 20184, 2020 to provide for a termination date of March 8, 2021.4, 2023. In addition to a base salary and bonus to be determined annually, the Krause Employment Agreement provides for, among other things, participation in stock benefit plans and other fringe benefits applicable to executive personnel and four weeks paid vacation per year.
In the event the Bank chooses to terminate Mr. Krause’s employment for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the Krause Employment Agreement), or in the event of Mr. Krause’s resignation from the Bank upon (i) a material change in functions, duties or responsibilities; (ii) a relocation of the principal place of his employment by more than 25 miles; (iii) liquidation or dissolution of the Bank; (iv) a breach of the employment agreement by the Bank; or (v) his death or permanent disability, Mr. Krause, or, in the event of death, his beneficiary, would be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (x) the remaining payments due to him and the contributions that would have been made on his behalf to any employee benefit plans of the Bank during the remaining term of the employment agreement andor (y) three times the base salary currently in effect plus three times the preceding year’s bonus.bonus payable in a lump sum.
Under the assumption that Mr. Krause’s employment with the Company was terminated on December 31, 2017,2019, for any reason other than Cause (as defined in the Krause Employment Agreement), he would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $2,411,478.$2,551,660 payable in a lump sum. Also, if Mr. Krause’s employment with the Company was terminated for any reason other than Cause, his outstanding andall unvested time-based and performance-based RSUs would become fully vested. If Mr. Krause’s employment with the Company was terminated for any reason other than Cause on December 31, 2017,2019, the market value of his RSUs which would have accelerated in vesting is $2,649,451.$1,644,088.
There is no employment contract with Mr. Krause that provides for any payments or early vesting of any stock options, or any RSUs upon a change of control.
Head of International and Commercial Banking
The Bank entered into an employment agreement with its Head of International and Commercial Banking, Mr. Yen, in 2005 (the “Yen Employment Agreement”). In addition to a base salary and bonus to be determined annually, the Yen Employment Agreement provides for, among other things, an automobile allowance of not less than $850 per month, participation in stock benefit plans and other fringe benefits applicable to executive personnel and four weeks paid vacation per year.
In the event the Bank chooses to terminate Mr. Yen’s employment for any reason other than for Cause, he will receive a severance payment of six month’s base salary. In addition, the Yen Employment Agreement provides for severance of two times current salary if he is terminated within 12 months of a change of control or if he resigns within 12 months of a change of control upon (i) reduction in his base salary, or automobile allowance, (ii) a material reduction in this duties; or (iii) a relocation of the principal place of his employment by more than 35 miles.
Under the assumption that Mr. Yen’s employment with the Company was terminated on December 31, 2017,2019, for any reason other than Cause, he would be entitled to receive severance payments totaling $202,500$217,500 or, in the case of a termination in relation to a change in control as described above, $810,000.$870,000.
56
Pursuant to the terms of our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, in the event Mr. Yen’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined thereunder) following a change of control, his outstanding unvested performance-based RSUs will vest and awards which performance cycles have yet to be completed will vest assuming target performance is achieved. If Mr. Yen’s employment with the Company was terminated for any reason other than Cause following a change in control on December 31, 2017,2019, the market value of his RSUs which would have accelerated in vesting is $1,646,151.
There is no employment contract with Mr. Yen that provides for any payments or early vesting of any stock options, or any RSUs upon a change of control.$968,034.
CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio
We are providing the following information about the relationship of the total annual compensation of our median employee and the total annual compensation of Mr. Ng, our Chairman and CEO.
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $7,434,083$7,413,241 as shown on the “Summary Compensation Table”. The annual total compensation of our median employee for 2017,2019, excluding the CEO, was $85,333,$78,992, resulting in a ratio of 8794 to 1, which is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable rules. Becausethere have been no significant changes to the Company’s broad-based compensation scheme nor to its employee population, which would significantly impact the compensation of the median employee, the median employee used in 2018 is being used for this 2019 CEO Pay Ratio disclosure.
In determining the median employee, we identified and included all U.S. based employees of East West Bank, other than the CEO who were employed with us as of December 31, 2017.2019. Further, we also included all employees of East West Bank outside of the U.S. based in Hong Kong and Taiwan who were employed with us as of December 31, 2017.2019. The U.S., and Hong Kong and Taiwan based employees represented 96% of our 2,9533,244 total employees.employees, excluding employees on leave of absence as of December 31, 2019. We excluded our employees of East West Bank (China) Limited, our wholly owned subsidiary in China and other employees based in China, totaling 120135 or 4% of our total employees. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had 2,7463,010 U.S. based employees and 207234 non-U.S. employees.
Our definition of “total compensation,” for purposes of calculating this ratio,determining our median employee, includes total cash compensation paid during 20172019 (excluding 401(k) deferrals and over-time wages) and the grant date fair value of restricted stock unitsRSUs (or RSU equivalents) awarded in 2017.2019. We did not annualize the compensation for any employees that were not employed by us for all of 20172019 or make any full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees. For our non-U.S. employees who were included in this calculation, we used the foreign exchange rates applicable as of December 31, 20172019 in order to convert their total compensation into U.S. dollars. After determining our median employee, we then calculated such employee’s annual total compensation, in a manner consistent with the requirements of Item 402(c)402(u), for purposes of calculating the ratio presented above.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2017,2019, each of Ms. Campbell and Messrs. Liu Estrada, and Renken eachLi served as a member of the Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is, or ever has been, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Except as provided herein, there are no existing or proposed material transactions between the Company or the Bank and any of its executive officers, directors, or the immediate family or associates of any of the foregoing persons. During 2017,2019, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or as a member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any entity that had an executive officer serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee.
57
Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
Proposal Snapshot
· What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for
· Voting recommendation:
FOR the advisory vote to approve executive compensation. The Compensation Committee takes very seriously its stewardship responsibility to oversee the Company’s compensation programs and values thoughtful input from stockholders. The Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
|
This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEO compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific NEO, but rather the overall compensation of all of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. We currently hold our Say-on-Pay vote every year.
We believe that the information provided in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2829 demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation. The sustained success of the Company’s customer focus and bridge banking model between East and West is reflected in the following key metrics:
• Eighth Consecutive Year of Record Earnings: Our full
• Strong Financial Performance: Our full year 2017 ROA of 1.41% and ROE of 13.71% were in the top 10% of publicly traded banks in the United States.1
• Among Best Banks in America: Ranked #5 of the 100 Best Banks in America by Forbes in 2018, ranked in the Top 15 since 2010.2
• Record Assets: Total assets grew 7% year over year, to reach a record $37.2 billion as of December 31, 2017.
• Record Loans: $1.68 billion.
• Record Deposits: $34.8 billion.
Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as reflected in this Proxy Statement and as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, which disclosure includes the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables, narratives and all related material.”
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the vote results when evaluating our compensation policies and practices in the future. Currently, we expect to hold an advisory vote on the compensation paid to our NEOs each year and expect that the next such vote will occur at our annual stockholder meeting next year in 2019
2021.
58
1 Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global.
2 Forbes article dated January 10, 2018.
Proposal 3: Ratification of Auditors
Proposal Snapshot
· What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
· Voting recommendation:
FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
|
KPMG LLP has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Company to be the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the 20182020 fiscal year. The stockholders are being asked to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2009. If the stockholders do not ratify suchselection by the affirmative vote of a majorityof the votes cast, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Under applicable SEC regulations, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm is solely the responsibility of the Audit Committee.
Representatives from the firm of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to stockholders’ questions and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees
The following is a description of the fees earned by KPMG LLP and other member firms for services rendered to the Company for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018.
| 2017 | 2016 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 2,871,596 | $ | 2,935,207 | $ | 3,381,506 | $ | 3,033,772 | ||||||||
| Audit-Related Fees | 34,830 | 24,495 | 35,142 | 36,453 | ||||||||||||
| Tax Fees | 104,865 | 7,500 | 7,660 | 8,090 | ||||||||||||
| All Other Fees | 60,332 | 12,050 | - | 29,091 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 3,071,623 | $ | 2,979,252 | $ | 3,424,307 | $ | 3,107,405 | |||||||||
| Audit fees |
| Audit-related fees consist of fees for certain professional services provided by KPMG Hong Kong in connection with the review of regulatory filings for |
| (4) | For |
59
Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consistent with SEC rules regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting fees for and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility and in accordance with the Exchange Act, it is the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve all permissible services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, except for minor audit-related engagements which in the aggregate do not exceed 5% of the total fees we pay to our independent registered public accounting firm during athe fiscal year.year in which the services were provided.
Each year, prior to engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, management submits to the Audit Committee for approval a list of services expected to be provided during that fiscal year within each of the three categories of services described below, as well as related estimated fees, which are generally based on time and materials.
Audit services include audit work performed on the financial statements, as well as work that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters and discussions surrounding the proper application of financial accounting and/or reporting standards.
Audit-related services include assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, statutory audits, employee benefit plan audits and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements.
Tax services include compliance and other non-advisory services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm when it is most efficient and effective to use such firm as the tax service provider.
As appropriate, the Audit Committee then pre-approves the services and the related estimated fees. The Audit Committee requires our independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the estimate periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it becomes necessary to engage our independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the initial annual proposal. In those instances, the Audit Committee pre-approves the additional services and related fees before engaging our independent registered public accounting firm to provide the additional services.
The following Report by Audit Committee is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and the report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by Audit Committee by reference therein.
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter most recently adopted by the Company’s Board on February 23, 2018.March 3, 2020. The Company’s Audit Committee Charter is available through the Company’s website at www.eastwestbank.com by clicking onInvestor Relations — Corporate Information — Committee Charting. The Audit Committee held ninefive meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. These meetings were attended by all members of the Audit Committee. The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, the Company, the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, both in fact and appearance. Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accounting firm. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and the independent registered public accounting firm’s capabilities, technical expertise and knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry.
Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has retained KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20182020 fiscal year. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that, due to KPMG LLP’s knowledge of the Company and of the industries in which the Company operates, including significant matters in audit, it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to continue retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will continue to recommend that the Board ask the shareholders, at the Annual Meeting, to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.
In performing its function, the Audit Committee has among other tasks:
| · | reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, |
| · | discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed |
| · | received from the independent registered public accounting firm written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the |
Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, for filing with the SEC.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Lester Sussman, Chairman
Molly Campbell
Rudolph I. Estrada
Paul H. Irving
Stock Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors and Management
The following table presents the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of March 29, 2018,31, 2020, by (i) each person or entity known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock,common stock (or have the right to acquire within 60 days), (ii) the directors and director nominees, (iii) the ChiefNamed Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and the three highest compensated executive officers whose total annual compensation in 2017 exceeded $100,000,Officers, and (iv) all directors and executives, as a group:
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Common Stock Number of Shares | Percent of Class | ||||||
| 5% Holders | ||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc.(1) | 13,767,215 | 9.5 | % | |||||
| 55 East 52nd Street | ||||||||
| New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) | 12,847,256 | 8.9 | % | |||||
| 100 Vanguard Boulevard | ||||||||
| Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||
| State Street Corporation(3) | 7,507,298 | 5.19 | % | |||||
| State Street Financial Center | ||||||||
| One Lincoln Street | ||||||||
| Boston, MA 02111 | ||||||||
| Directors and Named Executive Officers(4) | ||||||||
| Molly Campbell | 5,448 | * | ||||||
| Iris S. Chan | 20,301 | * | ||||||
| Rudolph I. Estrada | 15,475 | * | ||||||
| Gregory L. Guyett | 30 | * | ||||||
| Paul H. Irving | 25,137 | * | ||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 54,055 | * | ||||||
| Herman Y. Li | 40,130 | * | ||||||
| Jack C. Liu | 21,599 | * | ||||||
| Dominic Ng(5) | 619,986 | * | ||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 47,744 | * | ||||||
| Keith W. Renken(6) | 75,833 | * | ||||||
| Lester M. Sussman | 8,546 | * | ||||||
| Andy Yen | 45,098 | * | ||||||
| All Directors and Executive Officers, as a group (13 persons) | 979,382 | * | ||||||
* Less than 1%.
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Common Stock | Percent of Class | ||||||
| 5% Holders | ||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc.(1) | 16,661,376 | 11.4 | % | |||||
| 55 East 52nd Street | ||||||||
| New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) | 13,546,423 | 9.3 | % | |||||
| 100 Vanguard Boulevard | ||||||||
| Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||
| Directors and Named Executive Officers(3) | ||||||||
| Molly Campbell | 8,258 | * | ||||||
| Iris S. Chan | 26,932 | * | ||||||
| Archana Deskus | 1,893 | * | ||||||
| Rudolph I. Estrada(4) | 16,078 | * | ||||||
| Paul H. Irving | 30,268 | * | ||||||
| Douglas P. Krause | 69,969 | * | ||||||
| Herman Y. Li | 25,789 | * | ||||||
| Jack C. Liu | 21,472 | * | ||||||
| Dominic Ng(5) | 672,232 | * | ||||||
| Irene H. Oh | 68,676 | * | ||||||
| Lester M. Sussman | 13,677 | * | ||||||
| Andy Yen | 61,970 | * | ||||||
| Catherine Zhou | 2,512 | * | ||||||
| All Directors and Executive Officers, as a group (13 persons) | 1,017,833 | * | ||||||
| * | Less than 1%. |
| (1) | Represents shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, |
| (2) | Represents shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, |
| (3) |
| Excludes time-based or performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that were not vested as of March |
| (4) | 167 of these shares are held in three trusts, for the benefit of family members, for which Mr. Estrada has voting and investment power. |
| (5) | 53,000 of these shares are held in two trusts, for the benefit of family members, for which Mr. Ng has voting and investment power. |
62
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers and any persons holding more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities file with the SEC and each exchange on which the Common Stock is publicly listed, initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Directors, officers and stockholders holding greater than ten percent are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of copies of reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5 provided during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Company believes that all persons subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) filed all required reports on a timely basis.
Proposals of stockholders intended to be included in the proxy materials for the 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Secretary of East West Bancorp, Inc. 135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101 by December 19, 201814, 2020 (120 calendar days prior to the anniversary of this year’s April 18, 201813, 2020 mailing date).
Under Rule 14a-8 adopted by the SEC under the Exchange Act, proposals of stockholders must conform to certain requirements as to form and may be omitted from the Proxy Statement and proxy under certain circumstances. In order to avoid unnecessary expenditures of time and money by stockholders and by the Company, stockholders are urged to review this rule and, if questions arise, to consult legal counsel prior to submitting a proposal.
SEC rules also establish a different deadline for submission of stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to discretionary voting (the “Discretionary Vote Deadline”). The Discretionary Vote Deadline for the 2019 Annual Meeting2021 annual meeting of stockholders is March 4, 2019February 27, 2021 (45 calendar days prior to the anniversary of the mailing date of this Proxy Statement). If a stockholder gives notice of such a proposal after the Discretionary Vote Deadline, Proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority to vote against the stockholder proposal without discussion when and if the proposal is raised at the 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders.
The Company has not been notified by any stockholder of his or her intent to present a stockholder proposal from the floor at the Annual Meeting. The enclosed Proxy grants the Proxy holders discretionary authority to vote on any matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
Our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC and which we will make available to stockholders at the same time as this Proxy Statement. Our annual report and this Proxy Statement are posted on our website at www.eastwestbank.com and are available from the SEC at its website atwww.sec.gov.You may also obtain a copy of our annual report and any exhibits thereto without charge by sending a written request to Investor Relations, East West Bancorp, Inc., 135 N. Los Robles Avenue, 7th Floor, Pasadena, California 91101. The Company’s annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 will be mailed to all stockholders. The annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K includes financial statements required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the report thereon of KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Management knows of no business, which will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than as stated in the Notice of Meeting. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the Proxy holders to vote the shares represented thereby on such matters in accordance with the recommendation of the Board and authority to do so is included in the Proxy.
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. | |
| | |
DOUGLAS P. KRAUSE
Corporate Secretary
Pasadena, California
April 3, 2020
63
EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION01 - Molly Campbell 04 - Rudolph I. Estrada 07 - Dominic Ng 02 - Iris S. Chan 05 - Paul H. Irving 08 - Lester M. Sussman 03 - Archana Deskus 06 - Jack C. Liu For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1 U P X East West Bancorp, Inc. Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X Annual Meeting Proxy Card PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A038UUC + + Proposals — THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED AS FOLLOWS: “FOR” ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSALThe Board of Directors recommend a vote FOR A all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 AND “FOR” PROPOSALand 3. A 1. Election of Directors. The election of all directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and to serve until his or her successors are elected and qualified Nominees: + For Withhold 01 - Molly Campbell 04 - Paul H. Irving 07 - Dominic Ng For Withhold 02 - Iris S. Chan 05 - Herman Y. Li 08 - Lester M. Sussman For Withhold 03 - Rudolph I. Estrada 06 - Jack C. Liu For Against Abstain 2. Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. AnTo approve, on an advisory vote to approvebasis, our executive compensation. For Against Abstaincompensation for 2019. 3. Ratification of Auditors. RatifyTo ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for itsthe fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. 4. Other Business. The transaction2020. 1. To elect eight directors to serve until the next annual meeting of such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Meeting. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your votestockholders and to be counted. — Dateserve until their successors are elected and Sign Below NOTE:qualified: For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as namename(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or guardian,custodian, please give full title as such.title. If the signer is a corporation, partnership or other entity, please sign full entity name by authorized officer, giving full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1 U P X + 02SLXA
PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. REVOCABLE PROXYENVELOPE.q 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card For Against Abstain You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/EWBC or scan the QR code — EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Votes submitted electronically must be received by May 18, 2020 at 11:59 p.m., ET Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/EWBC IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders – Thursday,Tuesday, May 24, 201819, 2020 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY The undersigned stockholder(s) of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby nominates, constitutes and appoints Irene Oh and Douglas P. Krause, and each of them, the attorney, agent and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all stock of the Company which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Meeting”) to be held at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 6th Floor, Pasadena, California at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on Thursday,Tuesday, May 24, 2018,19, 2020, and any postponement or adjournments thereof, as fully and with the same force and effect as the undersigned might or could do if personally present thereat, as follows and, in their discretion, to vote and act upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 1 (ELECTION OF DIRECTORS); “FOR” PROPOSAL 2 (ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION); “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 (RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS). IF ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS PRESENTED AT THE MEETING, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED BY THE PROXY HOLDERS IN THEIR DISCRETION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY RATIFIES AND CONFIRMS ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEYS AND PROXYHOLDERS, OR EITHER OF THEM, OR THEIR SUBSTITUTES, SHALL LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF, AND HEREBY REVOKES ANY AND ALL PROXIES HERETOFORE GIVEN BY THE UNDERSIGNED TO VOTE AT THE MEETING. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF SPECIALINTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THE PROXY STATEMENT ACCOMPANYING SAID NOTICE. (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) REVOCABLE PROXY - EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q C Non-Voting Items + + Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/EWBC IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
01 - Molly Campbell 04 - Rudolph I. Estrada 07 - Dominic Ng 02 - Iris S. Chan 05 - Paul H. Irving 08 - Lester M. Sussman 03 - Archana Deskus 06 - Jack C. Liu For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1 U P X East West Bancorp, Inc. Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 038UVC + + Proposals — The Board of Directors recommend a vote FOR A all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation for 2019. 3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. 1. To elect eight directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and to serve until their successors are elected and qualified: For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. If the signer is a corporation, partnership or other entity, please sign full entity name by authorized officer, giving full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q 2020 Annual Meeting Proxy Card For Against Abstain
Annual Meeting of Stockholders – Tuesday, May 19, 2020 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY The undersigned stockholder(s) of East West Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby nominates, constitutes and appoints Irene Oh and Douglas P. Krause, and each of them, the attorney, agent and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all stock of the Company which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Meeting”) to be held at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 6th Floor, Pasadena, California at 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on Tuesday, May 19, 2020, and any postponement or adjournments thereof, as fully and with the same force and effect as the undersigned might or could do if personally present thereat, as follows and, in their discretion, to vote and act upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 1 (ELECTION OF DIRECTORS); “FOR” PROPOSAL 2 (ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION); “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 (RATIFICATION OF AUDITORS). IF ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS PRESENTED AT THE MEETING, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED BY THE PROXY HOLDERS IN THEIR DISCRETION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY RATIFIES AND CONFIRMS ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEYS AND PROXYHOLDERS, OR EITHER OF THEM, OR THEIR SUBSTITUTES, SHALL LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF, AND HEREBY REVOKES ANY AND ALL PROXIES HERETOFORE GIVEN BY THE UNDERSIGNED TO VOTE AT THE MEETING. THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF MEETING AND THE PROXY STATEMENT ACCOMPANYING SAID NOTICE. (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) REVOCABLE PROXY - EAST WEST BANCORP, INC. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q
Step 1: Go to www.envisionreports.com/EWBC. Step 2: Click on Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Step 3: Follow the instructions on the screen to log in. www.envisionreports.com/EWBC Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/EWBC or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. East West Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Meeting Notice 038VTC + + Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of East West Bancorp, Inc. to be Held on May 19, 2020 Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders, including the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is important! This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 are available at: Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials – If you want to receive a copy of the proxy materials, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request as instructed on the reverse side on or before May 9, 2020 to facilitate timely delivery. 2 N O T Easy Online Access — View your proxy materials and vote. When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials. Votes submitted electronically must be received by May 18, 2020 at 11:59 p.m., ET Step 4: Make your selections as instructed on each screen for your delivery preferences. Step 5: Vote your shares.
Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select delivery preferences: Current and future delivery requests can be submitted using the options below. If you request an email copy, you will receive an email with a link to the current meeting materials. PLEASE NOTE: You must use the number in the shaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a copy of the proxy materials. — Internet – Go to www.envisionreports.com/EWBC. Click Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. — Phone – Call us free of charge at 1-866-641-4276. — Email – Send an email to investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials East West Bancorp, Inc.” in the subject line. Include your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse side, and state that you want a paper copy of the meeting materials. To facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of proxy materials must be received by May 9, 2020. East West Bancorp, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on May 19, 2020 at 135 N. Los Robles Ave., 6th Floor, Pasadena, California, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Proposals to be voted on at the meeting are listed below along with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. The Board of Directors recommend a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3: 1. To elect eight directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and to serve until their successors are elected and qualified: 01 - Molly Campbell 02 - Iris S. Chan 03 - Archana Deskus 04 - Rudolph I. Estrada 05 - Paul H. Irving 06 - Jack C. Liu 07 - Dominic Ng 08 - Lester M. Sussman 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation for 2019. 3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must go online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the meeting, please bring this notice with you. Annual Stockholder Meeting Notice